Skip to main content

Security report for prenax.co.uk

Prenax · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prenax is a specialist B2B company focused on outsourced procurement and subscription management services for companies and institutions globally, with a strong presence in the United Kingdom. Their website presents a professional image with clear navigation, detailed service descriptions, and a customer success team localized to client regions. The business model centers on simplifying subscription management and optimizing procurement processes, targeting corporate and academic/public sectors. The company holds sustainability accreditation (Ecovadis), enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap framework, incorporating modern libraries such as FontAwesome and Matomo Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy. However, some security best practices like security headers are not evident, and SSL configuration details are not provided. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and respects DoNotTrack signals in Matomo, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional website content and contact information mitigate these concerns somewhat. Overall, Prenax's website is a well-structured, professional platform suitable for its B2B audience, but improvements in security transparency and domain registration verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prenax.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prenax operates in the niche market of subscription management and outsourced procurement, serving corporate and academic/public sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in providing full visibility, approval workflows, spend control, and a local customer success team. The business model likely involves service contracts and subscription fees. The presence of sustainability accreditation indicates a commitment to corporate responsibility, which may appeal to clients with ESG priorities. The website's multilingual support and regional targeting suggest a strategy for international market penetration. Partnerships, such as with HaileyHR for whistleblowing, indicate a mature compliance ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent news about new product launches (PxFlow) and upcoming blog content, signaling active marketing and product development.

Security posture

The security posture of the Prenax website is moderate. HTTPS is enabled, and privacy-conscious analytics (Matomo) with DoNotTrack respect are used. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, allowing granular user control. However, the lack of visible security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, as it impedes verification of domain ownership and legitimacy. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prenax
Description
Specialists in outsourced procurement and management of subscription-based resources to companies and institutions globally.
Key services
Subscription management, Procurement optimization, Spend control, Approval workflows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Bootstrap, Matomo Analytics, FontAwesome, CookiesJSR
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of Matomo with DoNotTrack enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional B2B service provider site with clear navigation and content
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  7. No forms detected on the homepage content
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design, enhanced by FontAwesome icons and Matomo Analytics for user tracking. Cookie consent is managed via CookiesJSR, providing compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs and uses Vimeo for embedded video content. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous and deferred script loading. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA live regions are implemented, indicating attention to inclusive design. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a professional B2B website, though security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prenax.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prenax.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.