Skip to main content

Security report for premia.lv

Food Union Latvia · Manufacturing · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Food Union Latvia is a well-established company operating in the dairy manufacturing sector since 1909, holding a leading position in the Latvian dairy industry. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear branding, comprehensive product and company information, and active engagement through multiple social media channels. The company targets consumers and business partners interested in dairy products, leveraging a traditional manufacturing business model with a strong market position in Latvia. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies including React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a detailed cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts are absent, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for Food Union Latvia, though enhancing security transparency and WHOIS data availability would further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching premia.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Food Union Latvia operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically dairy products, with a long history dating back to 1909. The company maintains a strong market position in Latvia and likely the Baltic region. Their business model focuses on production and distribution of dairy goods. The website supports this with detailed company information, contact details, and social media engagement. The absence of direct contact forms suggests a preference for traditional communication channels. The company appears to have a stable partnership ecosystem, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include active social media presence and compliance with privacy regulations, indicating a mature business approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by necessity, preferences, statistics, and marketing. Use of Cookiebot and Google Analytics is transparent and compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits the ability of users or researchers to report security issues. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding these missing elements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data availability and transparency to support domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Optimize website performance and loading speed to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Food Union Latvia
Description
Piensaimniecības nozares vadošā loma kopš 1909. gada
Key services
Dairy product manufacturing, Distribution and sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  3. Social media links are present for Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube
  4. Contact information includes physical address in Riga, Latvia and a phone number
  5. No email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content
  6. No forms for direct contact or data submission detected in the HTML content
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  10. Website content is in Latvian language
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with integration of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains and uses Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports a professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with premia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review premia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.