Skip to main content

Security report for precisionstrategies.com

Precision Strategies · Government · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Precision Strategies is a well-established integrated strategy and marketing agency specializing in delivering impactful outcomes for leading companies, causes, and campaigns. Their services span brand building, audience targeting, public affairs, digital marketing, and reputation management. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, with comprehensive service descriptions, case studies, and a strong social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern tools such as Gravity Forms and Slider Revolution, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though the absence of a published security policy and incident response details suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which slightly impacts trust but does not negate the overall legitimacy given the professional content and branding. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 27 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching precisionstrategies.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the government, non-profit, and related sectors, targeting organizations needing strategic communications and marketing services. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on integrated campaigns powered by data analytics and creative storytelling. The firm positions itself as a leader in public affairs and marketing strategy with a medium-sized organizational footprint. Their market presence is supported by detailed case studies and a broad service portfolio. The company leverages partnerships and social media to enhance reach and credibility. Growth indicators include the launch of fellowship programs and diverse service offerings. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Gravity Forms suggests secure form handling, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is addressed with comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The lack of incident response contact channels and security framework certifications represents a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Add incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with explicit GDPR and data retention statements.
  5. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Precision Strategies LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Precision Strategies
Description
Precision Strategies is an integrated strategy and marketing agency delivering game-changing outcomes for leading companies, causes, and campaigns. They focus on brand building, audience targeting, conversation driving, scaling impact, and reputation protection.
Key services
Brand Strategy, Message Development, Creative Services, Data & Analytics, Paid Media, Public Affairs, Digital Organizing, Multicultural Engagement, Crisis Communications, Online Reputation Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Typekit Fonts, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with Gravity Forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
omappapi.com
Marketing tools
Gravity Forms, Slider Revolution
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found, which is unusual
  4. Strong social media presence and structured data markup
  5. Multiple service offerings clearly described
  6. Good use of modern web technologies and CMS
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Privacy and cookie policies present and comprehensive
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi Builder framework, using modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Fonts are loaded via Typekit and Google Fonts, ensuring good typography. The site uses Slider Revolution for media presentation and Gravity Forms for data collection. Performance is moderate, with some heavy media content like videos. The site is fully responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA landmarks and improved keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD markup. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with precisionstrategies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review precisionstrategies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.