Skip to main content

Security report for precisionpowerservices.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.maddiesny.com is currently inaccessible due to a security filter blocking access. The WHOIS lookup for the domain returned no registration data, indicating the domain may be unregistered, expired, or under privacy protection that prevents data disclosure. The site content is limited to a security block message with contact information for support, providing no business or service details. This severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or technical infrastructure. The technical footprint is minimal, with only basic HTML and CSS detected and no evidence of modern frameworks, analytics, or security headers. The security posture is weak due to lack of accessible content and missing security best practices. Overall, the domain's legitimacy is questionable given the lack of WHOIS data and blocked content. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration status, enabling HTTPS and security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring the website content is accessible for proper evaluation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching precisionpowerservices.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The contact information references a support email and phone number associated with DX1app.com, which may indicate a third-party security or hosting service rather than the business itself. No information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The domain appears inactive or under restrictive security controls, limiting any competitive or operational insights.

Security posture

The website is currently protected by a security filter that blocks access, which may be a WAF or similar security mechanism. No security headers or HTTPS status could be verified. The lack of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates poor compliance posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The security score is low due to inaccessible content and missing best practices. The domain's WHOIS data absence further raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is immature and requires significant improvements to meet standard compliance and security expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Confirm domain registration status and renew or register if expired or unregistered.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and configure essential security headers.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance.
  4. Ensure website content is accessible without triggering security blocks to allow user and analyst access.
  5. Establish clear business and contact information on the website to enhance trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page content indicates a security filter blocked the request with a reference code and contact support information. No typical WAF brand detected but behavior consistent with a WAF or security gateway. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website content is blocked by a security filter and does not provide business description or services information.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
25/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to a security filter block.
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, indicating possible non-registration or expiry.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information limited to a support phone number and email unrelated to the domain name.
  5. No business or branding information available.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Minimal technical footprint with only basic HTML and CSS.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  9. Website likely non-operational or under security restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website consists of a single HTML page with inline CSS styling and no external scripts or frameworks detected. There is no evidence of CMS usage or advanced technologies. The page is minimalistic and serves only as a security block notification. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies are present. The site appears to lack mobile optimization beyond basic responsive viewport settings. The absence of security headers and HTTPS information limits the assessment of technical security. Overall, the technical implementation is very basic and likely temporary or placeholder in nature.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with precisionpowerservices.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review precisionpowerservices.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.