Skip to main content

Security report for preciosacomponents.com

Preciosa Components · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Preciosa Components presents itself as a leading global producer of premium crystal components and fine jewelry stones, targeting manufacturers and jewelry designers. The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks (Angular) and leverages Cloudflare Insights for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site content is minimal, primarily consisting of meta tags and a single-page app shell, with no visible contact or policy information. Security posture is basic with no explicit security headers or privacy compliance indicators detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, which impacts the overall risk profile. Strategic improvements in transparency, security, and compliance are recommended to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching preciosacomponents.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, specializing in premium crystal components and fine jewelry stones, positioning itself as a market leader. The business model appears to be B2B, serving manufacturers and wholesalers. The website lacks detailed business information, contact details, or certifications, limiting insight into operational scale or partnerships. No related or subsidiary domains were identified. The minimal online presence suggests a medium-sized enterprise with potential for growth through enhanced digital engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic, with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of Cloudflare Insights indicates some level of monitoring, but the lack of visible security best practices and missing WHOIS data are notable vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the absence of comprehensive security measures and transparency reduces overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  3. Enhance security headers and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS registration data issues to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Preciosa Components
Description
The world’s leading producer of premium crystal components and fine jewelry stones.
Key services
production of premium crystal components, production of fine jewelry stones
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Minimal content present, mostly a single-page Angular app shell with meta tags.
  3. No visible contact information, privacy, cookie, or terms policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection fields detected in the HTML content.
  5. Only external script detected is Cloudflare Insights for analytics.
  6. No social media links or emails found in the provided HTML.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection not disclosed.
  8. Website focuses on premium crystal components manufacturing business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular framework and modern JavaScript modules, indicating a contemporary tech stack. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and analytics services. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal but includes essential meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or backend technology is identifiable from the provided data. The site lacks visible forms or interactive elements, limiting data collection and user engagement capabilities. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to improve performance, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with preciosacomponents.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review preciosacomponents.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.