Skip to main content

Security report for pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de

Government · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'OZG Service Management' serves as a digital platform for managing government services in Germany, primarily targeting public sector employees or authorized users. It provides a login interface for users to access service management functionalities related to digital public administration. The platform is built using modern web technologies such as Vue.js and Vuetify, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. Hosting is provided by Colt, a reputable provider, aligning with the German locale of the service. However, the website lacks public-facing content beyond the login form, and no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, which limits transparency and compliance visibility. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure password inputs but lacks visible security headers and incident response information, which are important for robust security posture. Overall, the site is functional but basic in content and compliance, with moderate technical maturity and some gaps in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates within the government sector, focusing on digital service management for public administration. Its business model revolves around providing a secure access point for managing government digital services, likely integrated within a broader e-government ecosystem. The target audience is specialized, consisting of government employees or authorized personnel. The absence of detailed company information, contact details, or certifications limits assessment of market positioning and growth indicators. Hosting by Colt and use of modern frameworks suggest a stable technical foundation. The lack of advertising, analytics, or marketing tools indicates a service-focused rather than commercial orientation. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and password-protected login forms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies, incident response contacts, or data protection officer information, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens the compliance stance. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  3. Publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to improve security culture and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility and SEO metadata to improve user experience and discoverability.
  5. Consider multi-factor authentication to increase login security and protect sensitive government services.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A digital service management platform for public administration services, allowing users to log in with username/email and password.
Key services
User authentication, Service management for digital public administration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Vuetify, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Vue.js, Vuetify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Secure login form with password input

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for a government digital service management platform.
  2. No public-facing content beyond login form.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  5. Technical stack is modern with Vue.js and Vuetify but lacks SEO and accessibility enhancements.
  6. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) with Vuetify for UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. The use of prefetch and preload hints suggests some performance optimization efforts. Hosting on Colt's infrastructure provides reliable network and DNS services. However, the site lacks SEO meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data, limiting search engine visibility and social media integration. Accessibility features appear minimal, and no CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the front-end code. The login form is straightforward but lacks advanced security features such as CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhancements in SEO, accessibility, and security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pre-service-digitale-verwaltung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.