Skip to main content

Security report for praha2.cz

Městská část Praha 2 · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městská část Praha 2 operates as the official local government authority for the Prague 2 district in the Czech Republic. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for residents and visitors, providing access to municipal services, news, events, and community projects. It maintains a strong market position as a trusted government entity with a focus on public service and community engagement. The site targets local citizens and stakeholders interested in district governance and cultural activities. Technically, the website employs a modern yet straightforward technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts, managed via the Vismo CMS platform. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Hosting and domain registration align with Czech providers, ensuring regional compliance and reliability. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, though no active cookie consent mechanism is present. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected, indicating a solid security posture appropriate for a government website. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with minor areas for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. The risk level is low, and the site effectively supports its public service mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching praha2.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Praha 2 is positioned as a municipal government entity providing essential local services and community engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in official status, comprehensive service offerings, and strong local partnerships. The business model is public service funded by government budgets, focusing on transparency and citizen interaction. Revenue streams are typical for government bodies, including public funding and grants. The target customers are residents, local businesses, and visitors. Growth indicators include active community projects and digital service expansion. The partnership ecosystem includes city-wide organizations and service providers, enhancing operational effectiveness and public outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture for a municipal government site, with mandatory HTTPS and secure data handling. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are recommended best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies, though cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy control.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská část Praha 2
Description
Official website of Prague 2 municipal district providing information about local government, services, projects, news, events, and community resources.
Key services
Local government administration, Public information dissemination, Community services, Event calendar, Online services and ePortals, Social and cultural projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google Translate Widget, LiteSlider, Smart App Banner
Frameworks
Vismo CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smart App Banner
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal government website for Prague 2 district.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and accessibility features.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond standard legal notices.
  6. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Vismo CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Translate for multilingual support. The site uses LiteSlider for content sliders and Smart App Banner for mobile app promotion. Hosting is likely provided by Czech providers consistent with the registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to modernize security headers and improve performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with praha2.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review praha2.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.