Skip to main content

Security report for ppvo.bg

Политическа партия Русофили за възраждане на Отечеството · Government · Bulgaria

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a Bulgarian political party named "Политическа партия Русофили за възраждане на Отечеството" focused on Russian-Bulgarian relations and patriotic themes. It serves as an information and advocacy platform with regular content updates, news, and partner affiliations. The site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted likely by SuperHosting.BG. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience with clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security best practices like CSP headers and security.txt are missing. Privacy compliance is partial with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is limited due to GDPR but domain status and nameservers indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves its political advocacy purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ppvo.bg

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The political party operates in the government and non-profit sector, targeting Bulgarian citizens interested in pro-Russian political views and cultural preservation. The business model is advocacy and political engagement, with content dissemination and event promotion as key activities. The party maintains partnerships with related organizations, as evidenced by partner logos linking to other domains. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a niche market position. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage may limit direct engagement but aligns with typical political party websites. The use of Google Analytics suggests moderate user tracking for audience insights.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Security headers are partially implemented, with room for improvement by adding Content-Security-Policy and other headers. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contact information indicates a gap in formal security communication and vulnerability disclosure. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy exists and references GDPR, the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Политическа партия Русофили за възраждане на Отечеството
Description
Political party focused on Russian-Bulgarian relations, cultural preservation, and political activism in Bulgaria.
Key services
Political advocacy, Information dissemination, Event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a political party site focused on Russian-Bulgarian relations.
  2. Content is in Bulgarian language and well structured.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage or visible content.
  4. Privacy policy page exists and references GDPR compliance.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No explicit security or incident response contact information.
  9. Partner logos link to related domains indicating some ecosystem partnerships.
  10. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome for UI and interactivity. Hosting is inferred to be with SuperHosting.BG based on nameservers. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern security headers and improved accessibility compliance. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ppvo.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ppvo.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.