Skip to main content

Security report for poznejlitovel.cz

as4u.cz, s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poznej Litovel is an official city tourism and information portal for Litovel, Czech Republic, providing comprehensive details on local culture, tourism, accommodation, services, and events. The website targets tourists and local visitors, serving as a regional hub for promoting the city's attractions and activities. The business model appears to be supported by local government or municipal funding, focusing on community engagement and tourism promotion. Technically, the website employs a custom CMS called Public4u, leveraging common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site includes a Google Translate widget for multilingual support and demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No advanced security headers or explicit security policies were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain transparency and trustworthiness, although the website content and social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good content quality and user experience but would benefit from enhanced security practices and improved transparency regarding domain registration and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poznejlitovel.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Poznej Litovel occupies a niche as a local government-supported tourism portal, providing curated content about Litovel's cultural and recreational offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing and comprehensive local information. The business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by municipal budgets or tourism grants. Target customers include tourists, local residents, and cultural enthusiasts. Growth indicators include active event calendars and social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes the CMS provider as4u.cz and social media platforms. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and improve security and compliance to enhance trust and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and privacy policies, including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures, to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including official emails and phone numbers on the website to increase business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
as4u.cz, s.r.o.
Description
Official tourism and city information portal for Litovel, a town in the Czech Republic, promoting local culture, tourism, accommodation, services, and events.
Key services
Tourism information, Event calendar, Accommodation and services listings, Cultural and leisure activities information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, Google Translate widget, Public4u CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about Litovel city and tourism.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain transparency.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact likely via separate contact page.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No evident security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Website uses a custom CMS (Public4u) and common JS libraries.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Translate widget.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS (Public4u) with a technology stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, and Google Translate widget. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design elements and mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions but lacks advanced optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poznejlitovel.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poznejlitovel.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.