ALBIXON a.s. operates a specialized powder coating plant in the Czech Republic, offering advanced surface treatment and decorating services primarily for industrial clients. The company emphasizes high-quality coatings certified by GSB International and Qualicoat, leveraging modern automated technology and an experienced workforce. Their market position is that of a significant European player in powder coating with a focus on quality, speed, and eco-friendly operations. Technically, the website is built with modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and lazy loading libraries, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, lack of contact information, and missing WHOIS data reduce transparency and trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
40
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
52
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention powderpaintplant.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for powderpaintplant.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company targets B2B clients in manufacturing and industrial sectors requiring powder coating and surface finishing. Their competitive advantages include state-of-the-art automated equipment, certifications ensuring quality, and fast delivery capabilities. The business model is service-oriented with tailored orders and logistics support. The website content suggests a medium-sized enterprise with a strong regional presence in Europe. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website. The lack of contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact customer confidence. The company could improve by publishing detailed business and compliance information to strengthen market trust.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and a cookie consent mechanism indicating some privacy awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of contact information for security or abuse reporting is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact channels for incident response.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
ALBIXON a.s.
Description
ALBIXON Powder Coating Plant offers powder coating, decorating, and surface treatment services using modern technology and experienced staff. They provide high-quality coating with certifications and fast delivery.
Key services
Powder coating, Decorating, Surface treatment, Transportation and packaging of coated materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap (navbar, offcanvas), Lozad.js (lazy loading images), AOS (Animate On Scroll library)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL with http but likely https in real usage)
Cookie consent modal implemented
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content about powder coating services.
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
Cookie consent modal is implemented with options to accept, reject, and manage cookies.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
No social media links detected in the HTML content.
Website uses modern front-end libraries and lazy loading for images.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Certifications GSB International and Qualicoat are prominently mentioned as trust signals.
No signs of adult or questionable content.
WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the queried database, which is suspicious.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap framework, and lazy loading for images via Lozad.js. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation and accessible design features like ARIA labels. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. The lack of visible security headers and absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal third-party integrations, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with powderpaintplant.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review powderpaintplant.com.