Skip to main content

Security report for poutapilvi.fi

Poutapilvi · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poutapilvi is a Finnish digital agency specializing in digital service design, WordPress and WooCommerce development, and content marketing support. The company positions itself as a reliable partner for businesses and organizations seeking professional web solutions, emphasizing accessibility, usability, and customer service excellence. Their market presence is supported by multiple references and a high credit rating, indicating strong business credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Algolia search, Matomo analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent mechanisms and comprehensive privacy policies. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found, supporting a high trust level. Overall, Poutapilvi presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious digital presence suitable for its target audience. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and incident readiness would further strengthen their position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poutapilvi.fi

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention poutapilvi.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
17
Employees
0
Customers
17
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
76%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for poutapilvi.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Poutapilvi operates in the technology sector as a medium-sized digital agency focused on service design and web development. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise with WordPress and WooCommerce, complemented by content marketing and analytics services. The company targets Finnish businesses and public sector organizations, as evidenced by their references to projects with the Finnish Parliament and educational institutions. Their business model is service-based, generating revenue through project engagements and ongoing support. The presence of multiple office locations and a high credit rating indicates stable growth and market trust. Partnerships with HubSpot and use of advanced analytics tools suggest a forward-looking approach to digital marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and use of privacy-focused analytics (Matomo). However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers indicates gaps in formal security governance and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secure with no visible injection points. Compliance with GDPR is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formal documentation and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Poutapilvi
Description
Digitaalinen palvelumuotoilu, rautainen WordPress ja WooCommerce -tiimi, HubSpot Solution Partner, sisältömarkkinoinnin tuki ja mahtava asiakaspalvelu!
Key services
Palvelumuotoilu ja konseptointi, Brändin rakentaminen, WordPress verkkosivut, WooCommerce verkkokaupat, Saavutettavuus ja käytettävyys, Web-analytiikka, Sisältömarkkinoinnin tuki, Käyttöpalvelut ja jatkokehitys
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Algolia Search, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, A11y Dialog, Koko Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress theme framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  4. Professional and consistent branding and content
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Clear contact information with multiple channels
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a custom theme and uses WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates Algolia for enhanced search functionality and Matomo alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads efficiently with responsive design and accessibility considerations. The use of cookie consent scripts and a11y-dialog indicates attention to privacy and accessibility compliance. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but analytics are hosted on Matomo Cloud. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a positive user experience and operational reliability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poutapilvi.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poutapilvi.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.