Skip to main content

Security report for portachi.com

Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Portachi.com is a minimalistic website primarily serving as a contact point with a slogan emphasizing an 'Unhurried approach to perfection'. The site provides limited business information, including a Telegram handle and a physical address in Riga, Latvia. The domain is long-standing, registered since 2005, but the website content does not reflect a mature or fully developed business presence. Technically, the site uses jQuery 3.5.1 and loads resources from Google APIs, but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. The contact form is present in the code but commented out, indicating incomplete or inactive user interaction features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers, and the email is obfuscated as an image to reduce scraping. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching portachi.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind Portachi.com is not clearly defined on the website. The lack of descriptive content and absence of business details limit insights into market positioning or business model. The domain age suggests a stable registration, but the minimal site content and use of an unrelated external domain for email image hosting raise questions about professionalism and trust. The Telegram contact suggests a preference for direct messaging communication. No certifications or trust indicators are present. Overall, the business appears small and possibly informal or in early stages of web presence development.

Security posture

Security measures are minimal. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but no DNSSEC is configured for the domain. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to common web attacks. The contact form is disabled, reducing risk of injection attacks but also limiting user engagement. The email address is protected from scraping by being presented as an image, a basic anti-scraping technique. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved significantly to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Activate and secure the contact form with input validation and CAPTCHA to enable safe user communication.
  4. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  5. Replace external suspicious domain hosting for email images with internal hosting or text obfuscation methods.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a minimalistic contact page with a slogan 'Unhurried approach to perfection'. It provides contact details including an email image, Telegram handle, and a physical address in Riga, Latvia. The business purpose or services are not explicitly described.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with mostly contact information and no active interactive elements.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact form is present in code but commented out and inactive.
  4. Email address is presented as an image to avoid scraping.
  5. No social media links except Telegram handle mentioned as text.
  6. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. Domain is old and registered with a known registrar but website content is sparse.
  8. External domain bioporno.com used for email image hosting is suspicious and unrelated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple tech stack with jQuery 3.5.1 loaded from Google CDN. The HTML and CSS are basic with inline styles and no modern frameworks or CMS detected. The site is moderately performant but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is poor due to minimal meta tags and content. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. The domain uses name servers ns1.topdns.me and ns2.topdns.me, but no DNSSEC is enabled. The site lacks advanced technical features and would benefit from modernization and improved technical hygiene.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with portachi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review portachi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.