Skip to main content

Security report for porovname.cz

Turistika.cz s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.porovname.cz hosts an administrative login page for an advertising server operated by Turistika.cz s.r.o., a Czech company likely involved in tourism-related advertising. The platform uses Revive Adserver version 5.3.1 to manage and serve advertisements. The site is minimalistic, primarily serving as an authentication portal for internal or authorized users rather than public-facing content. The lack of public business information, privacy policies, or contact details limits transparency and user trust. Technically, the site employs legacy frontend practices such as an IE=7 compatibility meta tag and lacks modern security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content. The use of Revive Adserver indicates a specialized advertising technology stack, but overall technical implementation is basic with limited SEO or accessibility features. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.porovname.cz raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. From a security perspective, the site shows basic security hygiene with a POST login form but lacks critical protections such as HTTPS, security headers, and visible anti-CSRF measures. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trustworthiness and raises questions about domain ownership and legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile in terms of content safety, as it contains no adult or explicit material, but it suffers from significant security and compliance shortcomings. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and resolving WHOIS data visibility to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching porovname.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Turistika.cz s.r.o. operates an advertising server platform targeting tourism-related advertising campaigns. The business model centers on ad serving and management, likely supporting the parent tourism website www.turistika.cz. The company appears small in size with limited public-facing content or marketing. The platform serves internal or partner advertisers rather than general consumers. The lack of visible contact information or certifications limits external trust signals. The domain www.porovname.cz may be a dedicated sub-service or internal tool domain, but the absence of WHOIS data complicates legitimacy verification. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the connection to Turistika.cz. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the available data.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic and requires significant improvement. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential interception and clickjacking risks. The login form uses POST but lacks visible CSRF tokens or advanced input validation. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The missing WHOIS data is a critical trust issue, suggesting possible domain registration problems or privacy protection that is not justified by the business type. Incident response and security policy information are absent, limiting preparedness for security events. Overall, the site scores low on security maturity and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HSTS to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Resolve WHOIS data visibility issues by ensuring domain registration information is publicly accessible and accurate.
  5. Enhance login form security by adding CSRF protection, input validation, and multi-factor authentication if possible.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turistika.cz s.r.o.
Description
Advertising server platform operated by Turistika.cz s.r.o., likely serving ads related to tourism or travel.
Key services
Ad serving, Ad management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Revive Adserver v5.3.1, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Login form uses POST method
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Revive Adserver
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for an advertising server related to Turistika.cz s.r.o.
  2. No public WHOIS data available for domain www.porovname.cz
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details publicly displayed
  5. Uses Revive Adserver software version 5.3.1
  6. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected
  7. Legacy IE compatibility meta tag suggests outdated frontend practices
  8. Minimal content and basic design with no SEO or accessibility enhancements
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on Revive Adserver v5.3.1, a specialized ad serving platform, indicating a focused technology stack for advertising management. The frontend uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with legacy compatibility settings (IE=7), suggesting outdated frontend practices. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. Performance is moderate with minimal content and simple navigation. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no evident enhancements. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond title and robots noindex directives. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt is indicated by legacy meta tags and missing security features, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with porovname.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review porovname.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.