Skip to main content

Security report for pornmoviesstars.cc

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pornmoviesstars.cc operates as an adult entertainment platform offering free pornographic videos categorized into numerous explicit genres. It targets an adult-only audience and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate partnerships with related adult sites. The site has a basic design and navigation structure with moderate branding consistency but lacks professional business information and contact details. Technically, the site uses jQuery and custom JavaScript but does not leverage modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. Security posture is weak, with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or DNSSEC, and the WHOIS data shows inconsistencies such as a future domain creation date and lack of registrant transparency. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with significant room for improvement in security, privacy, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pornmoviesstars.cc

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market as a free porn video aggregator with a broad range of explicit categories. Its business model relies on advertising and affiliate marketing, linking to numerous partner adult domains. The lack of clear business entity information and contact details limits its credibility. The domain is relatively new (registered in 2025) but shows inconsistencies in WHOIS data. The partnership ecosystem is extensive within the adult content niche, but the site lacks transparency and formal business structure. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident from the data, and the site appears to operate as a small-scale adult content platform.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and DNSSEC reduces protection against common web threats. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. The WHOIS data inconsistencies and lack of registrant information further reduce trust. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site uses a search form without visible advanced security controls. Overall, the security posture exposes the site and its users to potential risks and regulatory issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  5. Review and correct WHOIS registration data to ensure accuracy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing free adult pornographic videos categorized by various explicit genres.
Key services
Free adult video streaming, Categorized porn video content, Affiliate links to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
trusttraff.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult content with explicit categories and no age verification.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. Site uses jQuery and custom JavaScript; no modern frameworks detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information provided; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Domain WHOIS data inconsistent with website content and date.
  7. Multiple external partner adult sites linked as 'friends'.
  8. Advertising via trusttraff.com detected; no clear analytics or tracking scripts.
  9. Site design and navigation are basic with moderate branding consistency.
  10. Content is adult-only and explicit, targeting mature audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack primarily based on jQuery and custom JavaScript. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. The site loads CSS and JS assets locally and includes an external script from trusttraff.com for advertising. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tags but no advanced responsive design detected. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The domain is registered with NameSilo, LLC but lacks DNSSEC and has name servers pointing to a related adult domain. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible, indicating technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pornmoviesstars.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pornmoviesstars.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.