Skip to main content

Security report for polipaks.com

Polipaks · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Polipaks is a flexible packaging manufacturer specializing in certified and sustainable packaging solutions tailored to diverse business needs. The company positions itself as a leader in sustainable packaging transition with over 29 years of industry experience. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor and Slider Revolution, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, suggesting the need for further verification of domain legitimacy. Overall, Polipaks presents a credible business with a focus on sustainability and quality manufacturing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching polipaks.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Polipaks operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on flexible packaging solutions with a strong emphasis on sustainability and certifications such as ISO 9001 and FSSC 22000. Their market positioning targets businesses requiring eco-friendly packaging options. The business model revolves around manufacturing and supplying packaging products, supported by detailed production process information. The presence of a dedicated careers subdomain indicates organizational growth and investment in human capital. The company leverages modern web technologies and tracking tools for marketing and analytics, suggesting a data-driven approach to business development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  4. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to reduce security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polipaks
Description
Flexible packaging manufacturer Polipaks provides certified and sustainable, packaging solutions designed to meet diverse business needs.
Key services
Flexible packaging manufacturing, Sustainable packaging solutions, Pre-press, extrusion, printing, lamination, slitting, bag making
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Professional design with clear navigation and good mobile optimization.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  4. No explicit email or phone contact found in provided HTML; contact form present.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. Certifications and sustainability focus are trust indicators.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Slider Revolution for dynamic content presentation. It integrates Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with polipaks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review polipaks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.