Skip to main content

Security report for polabske.cz

Polabské mlékárny, a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Polabské mlékárny, a.s. is a Czech dairy company specializing in the production and retail of traditional and innovative dairy products under the MILKO brand. The company emphasizes sourcing fresh milk exclusively from Czech farmers and offers a range of products including yogurts, curd cheeses, and bio items. The website reflects a medium-sized manufacturing and retail business with a well-established market presence since 1996. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome. While the site is mobile-optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism, it uses an outdated jQuery version and lacks visible security headers, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and basic privacy compliance evident through a privacy policy and cookie consent banner. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching polabske.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on dairy products with a strong regional brand identity. Its business model revolves around producing and selling dairy goods, supported by a career portal indicating organizational growth and recruitment efforts. The website's integration with social media platforms and a dedicated milk bar suggests diversified customer engagement channels. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but does not negate the company's apparent legitimacy based on content and social presence. The company targets general consumers interested in quality dairy products, leveraging traditional recipes and modern marketing. Strategic partnerships, such as the job portal, enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active social media and product diversification.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy preferences. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers like Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, the site would benefit from enhanced technical controls and documented security policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use a trusted registrar to improve domain legitimacy and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polabské mlékárny, a.s.
Description
A dairy company with the MILKO brand, processing fresh milk exclusively from Czech farmers, producing traditional and new dairy products including yogurts, curd cheeses, and bio products.
Key services
Production of dairy products, Retail sales via website and milk bar, Career opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.0, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Google Fonts, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Swiper.js, WordPress 5.3.20
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about dairy products.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed user controls.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  5. Social media presence is strong across multiple platforms.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  9. Privacy policy is present and linked in footer.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.20, utilizing jQuery 1.12.0 and jQuery UI 1.12.1, along with Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. It employs Swiper.js for interactive elements and includes a cookie consent script for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and uses standard SEO meta tags and Open Graph images. Performance is moderate, with some opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve loading times. No hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are technical debts that could impact user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with polabske.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review polabske.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.