Skip to main content

Security report for pointsbet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pointsbet.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that requires human verification via Turnstile captcha. This prevents direct access to the site's actual content, limiting the ability to analyze business, security, and compliance aspects fully. The domain is registered since 2015 with a reputable registrar and is consistent with a legitimate business in the gambling sector. However, no privacy policies, cookie policies, terms of service, or contact information are accessible in the provided content. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare security services, but no further technology stack or CMS details are available due to the blocked content. The security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of Cloudflare WAF indicates a proactive security measure. Overall, the site is rated low in accessibility and content quality due to the blocking mechanism, with a safe content rating given the gambling nature but no explicit adult content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pointsbet.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pointsbet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,025
Employees
18
Customers
824
Third parties
183
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 21 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pointsbet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mi.pointsbet.com2026-05-28
  • –va.pointsbet.com2026-05-26
  • –in.pointsbet.com2026-05-15
  • –la.pointsbet.com2026-05-13
  • –ny.pointsbet.com2026-03-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PointsBet.com is likely a medium-sized gambling business operating since 2015, targeting adult users interested in betting services. The domain age and registrar data support legitimacy. The business model presumably revolves around online sports betting and gambling services. No direct business descriptions, partner domains, or subsidiary information are available from the blocked content. The lack of accessible contact or policy information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company likely relies on Cloudflare for security and performance optimization.

Security posture

The security posture is partially observable through the use of Cloudflare's WAF and Turnstile captcha, indicating an emphasis on protecting the site from automated attacks and bots. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. The absence of visible privacy or security policies and incident response contacts is a gap in compliance and transparency. The site benefits from domain locking and a reputable registrar, which supports domain security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking.

Recommendations

  1. Provide accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  3. Ensure security headers and SSL configurations are properly implemented and publicly verifiable.
  4. Consider reducing WAF challenge frequency or providing alternative access methods for security researchers and compliance audits.
  5. Implement a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The HTML content is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying the user is human before accessing the site. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF with Turnstile captcha challenge.
  2. No actual website content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. No contact information or business details are present in the HTML content.
  5. The domain is registered since 2015 with a reputable registrar and no privacy protection.
  6. The site is likely a gambling-related business (PointsBet) based on domain name and known brand.
  7. No external links except Cloudflare domain for security scripts.
  8. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. No forms collecting user data visible except hidden inputs related to Cloudflare challenge.
  10. Security headers and SSL configuration cannot be assessed from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected by Cloudflare services including Turnstile captcha, indicating modern security infrastructure. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a challenge page, preventing analysis of the underlying CMS, frameworks, or performance characteristics. No analytics or advertising scripts are detected. The hosting is likely via Cloudflare's CDN and security platform. The technical debt or modernization opportunities cannot be assessed due to lack of content access. The site should ensure that security and privacy policies are accessible once the challenge is passed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pointsbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pointsbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.