Skip to main content

Security report for podripskemuzeum.cz

Podřipské muzeum v Roudnici nad Labem - příspěvková organizace města Roudnice n. L. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Podřipské muzeum in Roudnice nad Labem is a public cultural institution operated as a contributory organization of the city. It focuses on preserving and presenting the history and culture of the Podřipsko region through permanent and temporary exhibitions, workshops, lectures, and public events. The museum targets local residents and visitors interested in regional heritage and cultural education. The website reflects a small but professionally managed institution with clear contact information and active social media presence. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode platform, leveraging modern web technologies including HTTPS, CDN hosting via Amazon Cloudfront, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good design and navigation, though some SEO and accessibility features could be enhanced. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but privacy and terms of service pages are missing, indicating partial compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and basic security headers but lacks advanced headers and a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. No WHOIS data is available, which limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and contact details suggest legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The overall risk is low given the nature of the institution and the website content. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and terms policies, improving security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching podripskemuzeum.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention podripskemuzeum.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for podripskemuzeum.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Podřipské muzeum operates as a government-affiliated cultural institution serving the Roudnice nad Labem community and visitors. Its market position is local/regional with a focus on cultural preservation and education. The museum's business model is non-commercial, funded by the city, offering free and paid access to exhibitions and events. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, workshop fees, and publication sales. The target audience includes history enthusiasts, students, and tourists. The website indicates active engagement through social media and event announcements, suggesting a growth-oriented approach to community outreach. Partnerships include local cultural platforms such as kudyznudy.cz. The museum maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting its role as a trusted cultural entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages reveals compliance gaps. Security headers are minimal, lacking protections like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No security.txt or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of Google Tag Manager and analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public informational site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Publish terms of service and security policy documents to clarify user rights and security practices.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Podřipské muzeum v Roudnici nad Labem - příspěvková organizace města Roudnice n. L.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Podřipské muzeum v Roudnici nad Labem - příspěvková organizace města Roudnice n. L.
Description
Podřipské muzeum is a contributory organization of the city of Roudnice nad Labem, offering exhibitions and cultural events focused on the history and culture of the Podřipsko region.
Key services
Permanent and temporary exhibitions, Workshops, Lectures, Guided tours, Library services, Publication sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Platforms
Webnode website builder platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to a regional museum.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and functional.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern CDN hosting.
  7. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, physical address, and social media links.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN, and uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good design and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, benefiting from CDN delivery but could be optimized further. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The absence of advanced security headers and privacy documentation indicates technical debt in compliance and security domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the museum's digital presence effectively but should be enhanced for security and compliance maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with podripskemuzeum.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review podripskemuzeum.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.