Skip to main content

Security report for podravskamoslavina.hr

Općina Podravska Moslavina · Government · Croatia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Općina Podravska Moslavina is the official local government entity serving the Podravska Moslavina municipality in Croatia. The website functions as a public information portal providing residents and stakeholders with access to local government news, official documents, public calls, and contact information. The site is positioned as a trusted source for municipal information and transparency, targeting local citizens and interested parties. The business model is typical for government entities, focusing on service delivery and information dissemination rather than commercial activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for optimization. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome. The site is hosted under a Croatian registrar (CARNET), indicating local hosting and compliance with regional standards. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO practices are implemented adequately. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks several security headers and does not provide a dedicated security policy or incident response contact. There is no cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the security posture is acceptable but could be improved with additional headers and compliance features. The overall risk assessment is low given the nature of the site and its content. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent for GDPR, adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining regular updates to WordPress and plugins. These steps will enhance trust, compliance, and security resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching podravskamoslavina.hr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-sized local government entity with a clear focus on public service and transparency. Its market position is stable within the local Croatian municipal sector, serving residents with official information and administrative resources. The business model is non-commercial, relying on public funding and governance structures. Key services include dissemination of official documents, public notices, and community engagement through news and contact channels. The partnership ecosystem includes local transparency platforms and social media for outreach. Growth indicators are limited due to the governmental nature but the site maintains relevance through updated content and public engagement. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital maturity and compliance to better serve constituents and meet regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site lacks a formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which limits readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent and privacy policy details. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Općina Podravska Moslavina
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Općina Podravska Moslavina
Description
Službene stranice Općine Podravska Moslavina
Key services
Local government information, Public notices and calls, Documents and forms, News and announcements, Contact and transparency information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Font Awesome, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern plugins and libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official local government site for Općina Podravska Moslavina in Croatia.
  2. Content is in Croatian language and targeted at local residents and stakeholders.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit privacy policy found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is properly configured.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Social media presence limited to official Facebook page.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress infrastructure with Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses standard web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome icons. Hosting appears local and appropriate for the entity. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. The site is mobile responsive and has basic accessibility compliance. Technical debt is low but the absence of security headers and cookie consent indicates areas for modernization. No critical technical risks were identified, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce potential operational impacts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with podravskamoslavina.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review podravskamoslavina.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.