Skip to main content

Security report for poda.cz

PODA · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PODA is a Czech Republic-based internet service provider specializing in high-speed internet connections up to 2 Gb/s and TV services with over 160 channels. The company targets residential and business customers, offering both optical fiber and wireless internet solutions, alongside IPTV and VoIP calling services. The website reflects a medium-sized, established ISP with a professional online presence and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and tracking tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and CAPTCHA integration, though public security policies and incident response contacts are not found. Privacy compliance is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, though GDPR-specific details are basic. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poda.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention poda.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,250
Employees
13
Customers
2,184
Third parties
53
Weak passwords
34%

Latest record dated 2026-06-03 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for poda.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.poda.cz2026-06-03
  • –intra.poda.cz2026-06-03
  • –testintra.poda.cz2026-06-03
  • –testintra.poda.cz2026-06-03
  • –intra.poda.cz2026-05-17

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PODA operates in the telecommunications sector, focusing on providing fast and reliable internet and TV services in the Czech Republic. Their competitive advantage includes offering gigabit internet speeds and bundled TV services at promotional prices for new customers. The business model centers on subscription-based services with no long-term commitments for certain tariffs, appealing to a broad customer base. The company maintains active social media channels and a client zone for customer management. While WHOIS data is not publicly available, the website's professionalism and service offerings suggest a legitimate and established market presence. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PODA
Description
Internetové připojení do bytu s rychlostí až 2 Gb/s a TV s více než 160 kanály jen za pár stovek. Zjistěte dostupnost optického nebo bezdrátového internetu.
Key services
Optical fiber internet, Wireless internet, IPTV and TV services, VoIP calling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cloudflare Stream, Vue.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA v3)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection
  3. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts used
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end using Vue.js components, indicating a hybrid architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager to manage multiple analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with good security headers, and media content is delivered via Cloudflare Stream. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poda.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poda.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.