Skip to main content

Security report for pocproject.com

EE88 · Other · Vietnam

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EE88 is an online gambling platform targeting the Asian market, particularly Vietnamese users, offering a variety of betting and casino games. The website presents itself as a reputable brand with claims of licensing from Curacao and a business history dating back to 2012. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is average, with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, which is a significant gap. WHOIS data shows inconsistencies, including a domain creation date in the future and lack of registrant organization details matching the business claims, which reduces trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, compliance, and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pocproject.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EE88 operates in the online gambling sector, focusing on lottery, sports betting, casino, and other gaming services. Its market positioning is as a leading Asian gambling brand, leveraging affiliate marketing and a broad game portfolio. The business model relies on user registrations, deposits, and betting activities. Contact information and licensing claims support legitimacy, but domain registration inconsistencies and lack of privacy policies indicate potential risks. The site targets adult users interested in gambling entertainment, with a small company size and localized presence in Vietnam.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which are best practices for web security. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The WHOIS data anomalies and affiliate links to potentially suspicious domains further reduce security trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Clarify and correct WHOIS registration details to align with business claims and improve legitimacy.
  5. Establish an incident response contact channel and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EE88
Description
EE88 là thương hiệu nhà cái uy tín hàng đầu Châu Á được đánh giá cao về mọi mặt cũng như nhận được sự quan tâm đông đảo của người chơi. Cung cấp đa dạng các thể loại game như xổ số online, lô đề, thể thao, casino, game bài, slots game, đá gà, mang đến trải nghiệm giải trí và cơ hội kiếm tiền thưởng an toàn, minh bạch.
Key services
Online lottery, Sports betting, Casino games, Slots games, Cockfighting betting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Flatsome theme, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on online gambling targeting Vietnamese adult audience.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  4. Contact information is provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Flatsome theme and jQuery.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Affiliate marketing link present to external gambling site.
  8. WHOIS data inconsistent with business claims, lowering trust.
  9. No social media links explicitly found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Flatsome theme and jQuery library. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS but does not enable DNSSEC. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy compliance represent technical debt. The domain registration data is inconsistent, suggesting a need for administrative review. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business but requires security and compliance modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pocproject.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pocproject.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.