Skip to main content

Security report for pmi.com

Philip Morris International · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Philip Morris International (PMI) is a leading global tobacco company focused on transitioning its business towards smoke-free products that are positioned as better alternatives to traditional cigarettes. The company operates at an enterprise scale with a strong global presence and a clear vision to replace cigarettes with reduced-risk products. The website reflects this strategic direction with comprehensive corporate content, investor information, and product details aimed at a mature, global audience. Technically, the website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, and Gigya for customer identity management. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, employs advanced security headers, and integrates reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms, demonstrating a strong security posture. However, there is no publicly available dedicated security policy or incident response page, which could be improved to enhance transparency. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for a multinational corporation of PMI's stature. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations including GDPR, supported by clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pmi.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pmi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15,793
Employees
3
Customers
180
Third parties
15,610
Weak passwords
2%

Latest record dated 2025-07-30 · 6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pmi.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –contracted.pmi.com2025-07-30
  • –contracted.pmi.com2025-07-25
  • –pmi.com2025-06-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PMI holds a strong market position as a tobacco industry leader actively shifting towards smoke-free alternatives. Its business model centers on manufacturing and marketing tobacco and reduced-risk products globally. The company targets adult consumers and investors interested in sustainable tobacco alternatives. PMI's use of certifications such as ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 reflects its commitment to environmental and occupational standards. The website's content quality and branding consistency reinforce PMI's corporate identity and market credibility. The integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools supports data-driven customer engagement and business growth. PMI's strategic focus on innovation and regulatory compliance positions it well for future growth in a transforming industry landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. The use of Akamai service workers and CDN enhances security and performance. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected in the website content or scripts. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and may hinder external vulnerability reporting. The company should consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response details to align with best practices and regulatory expectations. Overall, the security measures in place are robust, but transparency and communication could be improved.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance transparency on data retention and processing policies related to analytics and marketing.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Philip Morris International Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Philip Morris International
Description
We’re building PMI’s future on smoke-free products that are a better choice than cigarette smoking. Our vision: these products will one day replace cigarettes.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of smoke-free tobacco products, Research and development of reduced-risk products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Sitefinity CMS, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target, Gigya (customer identity management), Akamai Service Worker, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Frameworks
Sitefinity
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Service worker for performance and security
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Target
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Adobe Target
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Gigya
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place
  3. No WHOIS public data available, indicating privacy protection
  4. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  5. Use of advanced marketing and analytics tools
  6. Content related to tobacco industry with focus on smoke-free alternatives
  7. No exposed security vulnerabilities detected in scripts or forms
  8. No public security or incident response policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform, indicating a modern and scalable content management system. It leverages a robust tech stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Adobe Target for personalization, and Gigya for customer identity management. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Akamai, ensuring fast content delivery and resilience. The site is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with proper meta tags and SEO configurations. Performance is rated fast, supported by service workers and resource preloading. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and mature digital infrastructure suitable for a global enterprise. Opportunities exist to improve documentation of security and compliance frameworks publicly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pmi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pmi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.