Skip to main content

Security report for pm-lab.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PM-LAB is a small Latvian service provider specializing in micropigmentation and permanent makeup services. The website is professionally designed using the Tilda CMS platform and includes modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and provides a clear navigation structure, targeting a general audience interested in beauty services. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies indicates a gap in compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pm-lab.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the beauty sector, focusing on micropigmentation and permanent makeup, targeting local Latvian customers. The business model is service-oriented with online consultation booking capabilities integrated via external widgets. The website's market position appears to be a niche local provider with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of Tilda CMS suggests a lean digital infrastructure. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. Marketing efforts include multilingual support (Latvian, English, Russian) and online booking integration, indicating an intent to serve a broader regional audience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The use of third-party widgets and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. The lack of WHOIS transparency and privacy policies represents compliance and trust gaps. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be improved to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Update WHOIS registration details for transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Mikropigmentācija, permanentais grims
Key services
Mikropigmentācija, Permanentais grims
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Tilda CMS, Google Fonts
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Tilda CMS with standard modern web technologies.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. Content is focused on beauty services (micropigmentation and permanent makeup).
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  10. External domains mostly related to Tilda CDN and widget providers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging standard web technologies including JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is via Tilda's CDN infrastructure, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve load times. However, no advanced frameworks or backend technologies are evident. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD data found. Accessibility is basic with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The technical setup is adequate for a small service business but could be enhanced with modern SEO, accessibility, and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pm-lab.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pm-lab.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.