Skip to main content

Security report for plzeninovativni.eu

Inovativní Plzeň · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inovativní Plzeň operates as a regional innovation ecosystem focused on supporting and developing innovative entrepreneurship in the Plzeň region. The platform targets a broad audience including children, students, investors, and companies, providing services such as incubation, acceleration, educational programs, and community events. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally designed digital presence with multimedia content and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though improvements are recommended in security headers and explicit privacy policy documentation. Overall, the domain and website present a trustworthy and credible digital front for a government or public-sector affiliated innovation initiative.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plzeninovativni.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key regional player in innovation and technology development, leveraging partnerships with local incubators, science centers, and investment agencies. Its business model revolves around ecosystem building, supporting startups and innovators from early education through to business expansion. The presence of multiple partner domains and event listings indicates a collaborative approach and active community engagement. Revenue streams likely include public funding, grants, and possibly service fees for incubation and coworking spaces. The target customer segments are diverse, spanning educational institutions, startups, investors, and the general public interested in innovation. Growth indicators include ongoing events, projects, and expansion of technological infrastructure such as TechTower and drone initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data or vulnerabilities are exposed in the HTML content. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially indicated through cookie consent but lacks a dedicated privacy policy page. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public information site but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web-based attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page outlining GDPR compliance, data processing practices, and user rights to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inovativní Plzeň
Description
Plzeňský inovační ekosystém pro podporu a rozvoj inovačního podnikání. Rozvíjí, inspiruje a podporuje inovátory v celém jejich životním cyklu, od školky po zahraniční expanzi.
Key services
Podpora startupů a inovátorů, Inkubace a akcelerace firem, Vzdělávací programy a workshopy, Organizace eventů a projektů, Technologická infrastruktura a coworking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Cookie Consent Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and video content.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. SSL/TLS is properly configured with HTTPS enforced.
  10. No security headers detected in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Swiper.js for sliders and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads multimedia content such as videos hosted on AWS S3, indicating a scalable hosting infrastructure. The presence of cookie consent scripts shows attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. There is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO, particularly in adding ARIA roles and enhancing metadata. The technical stack is appropriate for the site's purpose but could benefit from additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plzeninovativni.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plzeninovativni.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.