Město Plzeň · Government · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.
The website www.plzen28rijen.eu is an official municipal event site dedicated to the annual celebrations of the founding of the Czechoslovak Republic in Plzeň, Czech Republic. It provides detailed information about the event program, venues, accompanying activities, and photo galleries. The site targets local residents and visitors interested in cultural and historical events, positioning itself as a trusted source for event-related information organized by the city government. The business model is focused on public cultural engagement and event promotion without commercial sales or e-commerce components. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. The site employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate ensuring secure communications. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with EU regulations, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the content. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a good baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a privacy policy and incident response contact points are notable gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection, which is common and justified for this type of municipal website. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the website is professionally designed, trustworthy, and serves its purpose well. Strategic recommendations include adding a comprehensive privacy policy, implementing security headers, providing clear contact information for security incidents, and enhancing accessibility compliance to improve user experience and regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Detected services: Google Analytics
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention plzen28rijen.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for plzen28rijen.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with plzen28rijen.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plzen28rijen.eu.