Skip to main content

Security report for plukon.es

Plukon Food Group · Manufacturing · Spain

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plukon Food Group is a leading European company in the poultry sector, specializing in the production and supply of chicken products and ready-to-eat meals to major food market partners across Europe. The website reflects a mature business with a strong emphasis on sustainability, corporate responsibility, and quality assurance, as evidenced by multiple sustainability reports and the Beter Leven quality mark. The company operates multiple subsidiaries across Europe, reinforcing its market presence and operational scale. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform utilizing popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data implemented via JSON-LD for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, suggesting potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence aligned with the company's business stature. The main limitation is the lack of accessible WHOIS data, which restricts domain trust verification. Strategic recommendations include implementing additional security headers, enhancing accessibility, and publishing explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to further strengthen security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plukon.es

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plukon Food Group holds a strong position in the European poultry manufacturing and retail sector, leveraging a multi-country subsidiary structure to serve diverse markets. Their business model focuses on sustainable poultry farming and supplying both raw and ready-to-eat chicken products. The company targets large food market partners and consumers valuing quality and sustainability. The presence of multiple sustainability reports and the Beter Leven certification indicates a competitive advantage in ethical and sustainable production. The website's multilingual navigation and subsidiary domains reflect a broad geographic footprint and growth orientation. Partnerships with regional subsidiaries and a parent international site suggest a well-integrated corporate ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels via forms, aligning with corporate governance practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on forms to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, indicating good maintenance of the WordPress environment. The lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. To elevate security posture, the company should adopt comprehensive security headers, publish incident response and disclosure policies, and conduct regular security audits of their CMS and plugins.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plukon Food Group
Description
Plukon Food Group es una de las principales empresas de Europa en el sector avícola, y suministra productos de pollo y comida lista para llevar a los principales socios del mercado alimentario europeo.
Key services
Poultry farming, Chicken products, Ready-to-eat food supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.2, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Schema.org JSON-LD, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish with some multilingual navigation options.
  3. Strong focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  5. Contact is primarily via contact form and footer links.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit incident response or security policy pages detected.
  9. WHOIS data is not accessible, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.2 with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site includes structured data via JSON-LD for SEO benefits and uses Yoast SEO for optimization. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible in loading speed and accessibility. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, with clear navigation and consistent branding. No hosting provider details were detected from the HTML content. The technical stack is standard for corporate websites, balancing ease of management with functional requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plukon.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plukon.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.