Skip to main content

Security report for plugandtrack.com

PROGES PLUS · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plug and Track is a French company specializing in real-time monitoring of temperature, humidity, and other critical physical parameters for regulated sectors such as pharmaceuticals, agro-food, and research. Their product portfolio includes temperature data loggers, connected sensors using Ethernet, wireless, NB-IoT, and GSM technologies, as well as specialized solutions for refrigerated trucks and server rooms. The company emphasizes compliance, quality, and technological innovation, positioning itself as a leader in critical condition monitoring. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, leveraging WordPress with SEO and performance optimizations. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policy documentation. Contact information and social media presence support business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plugandtrack.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B clients in manufacturing, healthcare, and transportation sectors requiring precise environmental monitoring for compliance and safety. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive product offerings and integration capabilities with alerting and software solutions. The business model focuses on product sales combined with software and monitoring services. The website indicates a small-sized enterprise founded in 1985, with a consistent brand and clear market positioning in France. Partnerships with ERP and IT infrastructure providers suggest a broader ecosystem engagement. Growth potential exists in expanding IoT and real-time monitoring markets. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented via Tarteaucitron, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and terms policies, and establish incident response contacts to improve compliance and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PROGES PLUS
Description
Plug and Track est une entreprise française, spécialisée dans la surveillance en temps réel des températures, de l’humidité et d’autres paramètres physiques essentiels pour divers secteurs tels que la pharmacie, l'agroalimentaire, et la recherche. Les produits de Plug and Track incluent des enregistreurs de température comme les Thermo et Hygro Boutons, des sondes de température connectées en utilisant l’ethernet, les liaisons sans fil, NB-IoT, GSM ausi que des solutions spécialisées pour les camions frigorifiques et les serveurs informatiques. Ces dispositifs permettent non seulement un suivi détaillé mais aussi l'envoi d'alertes automatiques en cas de dépassements de seuils critiques, assurant ainsi la conformité réglementaire et la sécurité des produits sensibles. Avec une gamme allant des sondes simples aux systèmes intégrés plus complexes, Plug and Track répond aux besoins spécifiques de surveillance, de conformité réglementaire, et d’efficacité opérationnelle pour ses clients. Leur engagement envers la qualité et l'innovation technologique fait de Plug and Track un leader dans le domaine de la surveillance de conditions critiques.
Key services
Temperature and humidity data loggers, Real-time monitoring sensors, Alarm and alert systems, Software for monitoring and compliance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, WP Rocket, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Tarteaucitron (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional business site focused on temperature and humidity monitoring
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Tarteaucitron
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear
  6. Use of modern SEO and performance plugins
  7. Contact information clearly provided
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response info
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and WP Rocket for SEO and performance optimization. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images and scripts. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The absence of WHOIS data suggests a need to verify domain registration and hosting provider details. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business presence but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plugandtrack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plugandtrack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.