Skip to main content

Security report for platnasmlouva.cz

Advokátní kancelář JUDr. Jan Svoboda · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Platná smlouva.cz is a Czech legal services provider specializing in contract validity and drafting, operated by Advokátní kancelář JUDr. Jan Svoboda. The company targets clients needing professional legal assistance with contracts, offering services both online and offline. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to Czech-speaking users. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and encrypted data transmission, though some improvements are recommended such as adding security headers and updating outdated libraries. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the business information and contact details are transparent and consistent with a legitimate legal practice. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front for its niche legal services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching platnasmlouva.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the legal services sector with a focus on contract law, serving individuals and businesses in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in combining traditional legal expertise with online service delivery, enabling faster turnaround and cost efficiency. Revenue streams likely come from contract review and drafting fees. The company maintains a small size and emphasizes trust through registered lawyers and confidentiality. The partnership ecosystem includes online marketing and analytics providers but no evident strategic business partners. Growth indicators include active blog content and service diversification. The company’s market position is niche but stable, leveraging digital channels effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with SSL encryption, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate spam. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. The use of an outdated jQuery version could expose the site to known vulnerabilities. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency. Data protection practices are mentioned, including confidentiality obligations and encrypted data transmission, aligning with GDPR principles. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with standard best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and provide a dedicated security contact or abuse email address.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advokátní kancelář JUDr. Jan Svoboda
Registration number
13326732
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokátní kancelář JUDr. Jan Svoboda
Description
Jsme tým právníků, který vám pomůže zajistit platnost a účinnost smlouvy. Právní služby nabízíme také online. Smlouvy kontrolujeme i sepisujeme.
Key services
Contract review, Contract drafting, Legal consultancy in contract law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, SlickNav (responsive menu), WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • SSL encryption (HTTPS)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam
  • Data encryption via SSL for form submissions
  • Confidentiality statement regarding data handling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TOPlist
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to legal contract services.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  4. Website uses HTTPS with SSL and includes anti-spam measures via Google reCAPTCHA.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. SEO and metadata are well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with some outdated libraries (jQuery 1.11).
  10. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.11, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v3. The site uses responsive design techniques with SlickNav for mobile menus. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses SSL encryption properly, but lacks some modern security headers. The use of older JavaScript libraries suggests some technical debt. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with platnasmlouva.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review platnasmlouva.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.