Skip to main content

Security report for plati.market

Fincom Teh Ltd. · E-commerce · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plati.Market is a well-established Russian-language online marketplace specializing in digital goods such as game keys, accounts, software licenses, subscriptions, and in-game currency. The platform offers a large catalog with over a million items from verified sellers, supported by user reviews and ratings, positioning itself as a significant player in the digital goods e-commerce sector. The business model focuses on facilitating secure and convenient transactions between buyers and sellers with fast delivery and buyer protection mechanisms. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics, but lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, which is a critical security gap. The absence of HTTPS exposes users to potential data interception risks. Security policies and terms of service are present but basic, and no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected, indicating partial privacy compliance. The domain is mature and registered consistently with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, while the platform is functionally rich and professionally designed, its security posture requires urgent improvement to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of plati.market. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plati.market

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plati.Market operates in the e-commerce sector, targeting Russian-speaking customers interested in digital goods. Its competitive advantage lies in a vast product range, active user base, and integrated buyer protection. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees and premium services for sellers. The platform integrates with partner services such as Sellane Limited for powering the site and Digiseller for seller management. The presence of Telegram bots and channels supports customer engagement and marketing. The business shows signs of growth and stability with a domain age of 7 years and consistent registration data. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive product catalog support its market position as a leading digital goods marketplace in its region.

Security posture

The current security posture of Plati.Market is weak due to the lack of an active SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support. This exposes all data transmissions to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The site does implement SPF records for email security but lacks other critical security headers and mechanisms such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and modern TLS protocols. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of secure forms or input validation details is a concern. Immediate remediation is required to implement HTTPS and enhance security headers to protect user data and comply with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper for sliders, Fancybox for modals, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Yandex Metrika, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, performance is slow with a load time of approximately 19.8 seconds and a large page size (~2MB) with many resources (644). The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS records point to IP 91.215.42.185 and nameservers under galleryvalery.com. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built platform. Technical debt is indicated by the lack of HTTPS and some hidden or disabled UI elements. Modernization opportunities include improving performance, security, and privacy compliance to enhance user experience and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plati.market. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plati.market.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.