Skip to main content

Security report for platform2020prague.com

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The PLATFORM 2020 PRAGUE website serves as an informational platform dedicated to Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM), aligning with resolutions from WHO, WHA, European Parliament, and Council of Europe. It targets a general audience interested in TCIM disciplines and provides public access, registration, and member login functionalities. The platform is small-scale, founded in 2020, and hosted by a Czech registrar consistent with its geographic focus. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS3, uses Google Fonts for typography, and includes a background video for visual appeal. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS detection. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a.s., a Czech hosting provider. Performance is moderate with basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers and does not enable DNSSEC, which could improve domain security. There is no privacy or cookie policy, no contact information, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are gaps in compliance and security posture. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is safe with no adult or explicit content. The domain registration data is consistent and appropriate for the business. The site would benefit from adding privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information to improve trust and compliance. The AI overall score is moderate at 66, reflecting good content and business credibility but weak security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching platform2020prague.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche informational market focused on TCIM disciplines, leveraging resolutions from major health organizations to establish credibility. Its business model is primarily informational and community-driven, targeting individuals interested in alternative medicine. The lack of commercial elements suggests limited revenue streams, possibly relying on community engagement or institutional support. The platform's small size and recent founding indicate early-stage development with potential for growth. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The platform's consistent branding and clear mission support its market positioning as a trusted knowledge resource in the TCIM field.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low to moderate. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes it to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. Lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Deploy standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident reporting channels.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A unique information instrument for presentation of TCIM disciplines according to the principles of resolutions of WHO, WHA, European Parliament, Council of Europe. The platform is society-driven and aims to support public interest in Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM).
Key services
Information presentation, Public access to TCIM knowledge, Member registration and login
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  3. No security or incident response information available.
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  5. The website uses a background video and custom styling with Google Fonts.
  6. The site offers public entry, registration, and member login links.
  7. No forms with fields detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. No social media links or icons found.
  9. No JSON-LD or structured data embedded.
  10. No security headers or meta tags indicating advanced security measures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, clean HTML5 and CSS3 structure with Google Fonts for typography. It includes a background video element for visual engagement. No advanced JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms were detected, indicating a lightweight and straightforward technical stack. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a.s., a Czech hosting provider. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, but accessibility features are basic. There is no evidence of performance optimization techniques such as minification or caching headers in the provided data. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with platform2020prague.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review platform2020prague.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.