Skip to main content

Security report for plastikse.com

Plastikse, UAB · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plastikse, UAB is a Lithuania-based manufacturer specializing in PET bottles and customized packaging solutions. Established in 2009, the company leverages over 20 years of cumulative industry experience to serve a global clientele of over 250 loyal customers. Their business model focuses on bespoke design and sustainable manufacturing practices, including the use of recycled materials and renewable energy sources. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and comprehensive product offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, ensuring good SEO and user interaction capabilities. Hosting is provided by Bluehost with Cloudflare DNS, and the site employs HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin offering granular user controls, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response policies suggests room for improvement. The site demonstrates good privacy compliance with clear policies and contact information but lacks a dedicated vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Overall, Plastikse presents a trustworthy and professional online presence aligned with its manufacturing business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and continuous monitoring of privacy compliance to maintain trust and security standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plastikse.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plastikse operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on PET bottle production with a strong emphasis on sustainability and quality certifications such as FSSC 22000 and ISO 9001. Their competitive advantage lies in custom design capabilities and use of green energy, appealing to environmentally conscious clients. The business model is B2B manufacturing with a global customer base. Growth indicators include a large production capacity (300+ million units/year) and a growing clientele. Partnerships are evident through social media presence but no explicit partner domains were identified. The company maintains a professional digital footprint supporting its market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS encryption, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for enhancement. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic privacy compliance reviews to maintain GDPR adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Plastikse, UAB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plastikse, UAB
Description
Experts in PET bottles providing high-end customized packaging solutions with a focus on quality, sustainability, and advanced technologies.
Key services
Custom PET bottle design, Production of PET bottles and jars, Sustainable packaging solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent, Google reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear business focus on PET bottle manufacturing and sustainability.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  4. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No visible security or privacy red flags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Contact Form 7 for user interaction. The presence of Google Fonts and Swiper.js indicates a focus on design and user experience. Hosting is managed by Bluehost with Cloudflare DNS, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and employs a cookie consent plugin for GDPR compliance. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended to enhance robustness and user inclusivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plastikse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plastikse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.