Skip to main content

Security report for plastika.lv

SIA "PLASTIKA" · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "PLASTIKA" is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in custom plastic and rubber product production. With over 25 years in the industry, the company offers a full production cycle including mold and casting form creation, focusing on quality and customer-specific requirements. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting business clients needing tailored manufacturing solutions. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, hosted via Amazon Cloudfront, and uses common libraries such as jQuery and fancybox. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are employed for user tracking, though privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating room for compliance improvement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and formal incident response information. Overall, the site is functional, mobile-optimized, and content-rich for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plastika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a stable, small-sized manufacturer with a long-standing presence in the Latvian market. Its competitive advantages include a complete production cycle, cost-effective pricing, and personalized client service. The business model centers on custom manufacturing services for plastic and rubber products, appealing primarily to industrial and commercial clients. The website's lack of detailed contact information and absence of privacy or security policies suggest a basic digital maturity level. The partnership with Mozello for website generation and use of Amazon Cloudfront for hosting indicate reliance on established third-party services. No visible certifications or trust badges limit external validation of credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user engagement features. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is a significant gap given the use of Google Analytics. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue management. The use of somewhat outdated jQuery version (2.2.4) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data collection.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "PLASTIKA"
Description
Piedāvājam kvalitatīvu plastmasas un gumijas izstrādājumu ražošanu pēc individuāla pasūtījuma. Esam vairāk kā 25 gadus ražošanas tirgū. Stabils ražošanas uzņēmums, kas piedāvā pilnu darba kontroles ciklu no nulles līdz gatavam produktam, izdevīgas cenas, iespēju sagatavot izejvielas ražošanai un individuālu klientu vēlmu izskatīšanu.
Key services
custom plastic product manufacturing, custom rubber product manufacturing, mold and casting form creation, full production cycle management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, fancybox3, Google Analytics, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or registration dates extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided on the homepage content.
  5. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking user behavior.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. Content is business-focused, describing manufacturing services for plastic and rubber products.
  9. No social media links or company contact details found in the HTML content.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Mozello CMS and leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. The tech stack includes jQuery 2.2.4 and fancybox3 for UI components, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and features a clear navigation structure. However, the absence of modern security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security domains. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles used in menus but no advanced accessibility features noted. SEO is basic, with meta description and canonical link present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plastika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plastika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.