Skip to main content

Security report for plasmatreat.co.uk

Plasmatreat GmbH · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plasmatreat GmbH operates a professional website focused on plasma technology solutions for industrial applications. The company offers a broad range of plasma-related products and services, targeting manufacturing sectors such as automotive, electronics, life sciences, and energy. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with structured data, multiple regional contact points, and a consistent brand image. Technically, the site uses TYPO3 CMS, integrates modern front-end libraries, and employs consent management and bot protection mechanisms. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA in place, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming errors, which slightly impacts trust but does not negate the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plasmatreat.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a specialized B2B provider in plasma technology with a global footprint supported by regional partner sites. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and technology services, with key revenue streams likely from product sales, system rentals, and training services. The presence of multiple contact points and localized websites indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. The website content and navigation reflect a clear focus on industrial clients, emphasizing technical expertise and service support. Growth indicators include active event participation and educational offerings via the Plasmatreat Academy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Consent management via Usercentrics indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. The lack of WHOIS transparency reduces domain trustworthiness slightly. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Plasmatreat GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plasmatreat GmbH
Description
Plasmatreat GmbH is a company specializing in plasma technology solutions, offering products and services related to plasma surface treatment, plasma cleaning, plasma coating, and related industrial applications. They serve multiple industries including automotive, electronics, life sciences, new energies, consumer goods, packaging, textiles, and transportation.
Key services
Openair-Plasma® Systems, Plasma Surface Treatment, Plasma Cleaning, Plasma Coating, Service & Support, Training and Seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Font Awesome 7 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, Google reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Consent management via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to domain naming error.
  3. Consent management implemented with Usercentrics.
  4. Multiple regional contact phone numbers provided in structured data.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. Website uses TYPO3 CMS and modern front-end technologies.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system suitable for enterprise use. It uses modern front-end assets including Font Awesome 7 Pro icons and integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. Performance appears moderate with compressed CSS assets and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical URLs but could be enhanced with richer metadata and structured content. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plasmatreat.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plasmatreat.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.