Skip to main content

Security report for planuj1.cz

Městská část Praha 1 · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website planuj.praha1.cz serves as the official platform for the sustainable development strategy of the Prague 1 district. It provides detailed information about urban planning initiatives, public participation opportunities, sociological research, and participatory budgeting. The site targets residents, local stakeholders, and visitors interested in the future development of Prague 1. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js. It is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. However, the absence of WHOIS data and privacy/cookie policies indicates areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The security posture is moderate, with no detected vulnerabilities but lacking security headers. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy as a government resource, but could enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planuj1.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention planuj1.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for planuj1.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government entity focused on urban development and community engagement in Prague 1. Its business model is public sector service provision, emphasizing transparency and citizen participation. The site features expert testimonials and research collaborations, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem with research firms and municipal bodies. The content and structure suggest a medium-sized operation with a clear focus on sustainable urban planning. The lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS data slightly limits direct business credibility but aligns with typical government web presence practices. The site is positioned as a key informational and participatory hub for Prague 1 residents and stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, protecting data in transit. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit incident response contacts or security policies, which are recommended for improved readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, potentially exposing the site to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational government content but should be enhanced to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská část Praha 1
Description
The website is dedicated to the sustainable development strategy of Prague 1 district, focusing on urban planning, public participation, sociological research, and community engagement to improve quality of life and urban environment.
Key services
Public participation in urban planning, Sociological research dissemination, Information on participatory budgets, Downloadable resources, Contact and communication with municipal authorities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to CZ NIC registry policies or privacy.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  5. Site uses modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  8. Content is in Czech language focused on Prague 1 district urban planning.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain, indicating self-hosted resources. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by reducing asset sizes and leveraging caching. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The lack of security headers and privacy policies are notable technical gaps. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planuj1.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planuj1.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.