Security report for planprosessen.no
Ambita AS and Norconsult Digital AS · Government · Norway
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
Planprosessen.no is a Norwegian digital platform designed to streamline and digitalize the planning notification process for both private and public planning proposals. The service enables users to create projects, gather necessary information, prepare plan data, and distribute notifications digitally through the Altinn platform. The website is co-developed and supported by Ambita AS and Norconsult Digital AS, two established Norwegian companies, positioning Planprosessen as a niche but trusted solution integrated with national digital infrastructure. The platform targets planning consultants and applicants, offering a comprehensive SaaS model that simplifies regulatory compliance and communication with affected parties and authorities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Advanced Custom Fields, and integrates tracking and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization, with a moderate performance profile. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security posture is solid with good privacy compliance, including a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and consistency. Strategically, Planprosessen is well-positioned within the Norwegian government and technology sectors, leveraging partnerships with Ambita AS, Norconsult Digital AS, KS, and Altinn. The platform's integration with public digital services and focus on regulatory compliance provide competitive advantages. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 65/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
- Critical
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
- CWE-319
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V3.4.1
- RFC 6797 §6.1.1
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: hsts_min_age 63072000
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(a): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(a): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching planprosessen.no
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 62
- Security headers
- 30
- Email security
- 60
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 65
- Average
- 65
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
- Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks followed.
- Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
- Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and minimal user tracking.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Ambita AS and Norconsult Digital AS
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Ambita AS and Norconsult Digital AS
- Description
- Planprosessen is a digital tool for notification of plan startup to affected parties and consultation authorities. It digitalizes planning processes for private and public planning proposals, allowing project creation, information gathering, plan preparation, and notification distribution via Altinn.
- Key services
- Digital plan notification, Automatic retrieval of affected parties, Digital distribution of forms and plan outlines, Integration with Altinn, Project management and communication
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Tiny Slider 2.9.3, Advanced Custom Fields Pro 6.4.0.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cookiebot
- Frameworks
- WordPress
- Platforms
- Altinn (integration), KS FIKS Meldingsformidler (integration)
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
- Ad personalization and tracking denied by default in Google consent config
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of secure external scripts with async loading
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Facebook Pixel
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cookiebot session tracker
- Marketing tools
- Hotjar, Cookiebot
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is a professional digital service platform for Norwegian planning process notifications
- Strong integration with Norwegian public digital infrastructure (Altinn)
- Good privacy and cookie consent implementation
- No visible security or content blocking issues
- Clear contact information and business partnerships displayed
- Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with planprosessen.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planprosessen.no.