Skip to main content

Security report for planetecomsolutions.com

Planet E-Com Solutions Pvt. Ltd. · Technology · India

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Planet E-Com Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (PECS) is a mid-sized Indian technology company specializing in custom web and mobile application development, cybersecurity, and digital transformation services. With over 25 years of experience and multiple industry certifications, PECS serves a diverse range of sectors including public sector, professional services, energy, BFSI, education, and healthcare. The company positions itself as a reliable partner for SMEs and large enterprises seeking tailored software solutions. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and slick carousel, and integrates analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service clearly available. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planetecomsolutions.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PECS operates in the competitive Indian IT services market, leveraging its long-standing presence and certifications to build credibility. Its business model focuses on B2B engagements delivering custom software solutions across multiple industries. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft, Liferay, Google Cloud, and others, enhancing its market positioning. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled lead generation approach, possibly via contact forms on other pages. The company targets businesses seeking digital transformation and software development, with a focus on quality and compliance. Growth indicators include a large client base (800+ clients) and extensive project delivery history. Strategic observations highlight opportunities to strengthen privacy compliance and incident response transparency to meet evolving regulatory demands.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could expose the site to certain attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact trust and compliance. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism also suggests incomplete GDPR adherence. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a mid-sized IT services company but requires enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Include visible and verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Planet E-Com Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Description
PECS is an experienced Website Development Company in India offering custom web development, mobile app development, cybersecurity, PFMS, and more. They serve SMEs and large enterprises globally with over 25 years of experience.
Key services
Web Development, Mobile App Development, Liferay Development, PFMS/IFMS Portal Development, Cyber Security Assessment, Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC) Services, Digital Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, WOW.js, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or main sections.
  3. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and terms of service are missing or not clearly linked.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site.
  5. Multiple certifications and partner logos enhance trustworthiness.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled which is a minor security gap.
  8. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  9. Social media links are present but follower counts are zero or not displayed.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and slick carousel for interactive sliders. Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhance typography and iconography. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, supporting performance and reliability. However, no CMS or back-end platform is detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are technical risks that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security hardening and enhanced privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planetecomsolutions.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planetecomsolutions.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.