Skip to main content

Security report for planeeringud.ee

Zone Media OÜ · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website planeeringud.ee serves as the official Estonian national repository for established planning documents, providing public access to planning data and downloadable files. It targets municipalities, planners, and the general public interested in regional planning information. The platform is built on modern Angular technology with Material Design components, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly interface. The site integrates Google Analytics for usage tracking but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and a Content-Security-Policy header, though additional security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site is professionally presented and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planeeringud.ee

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The service operates as a government-related data repository, positioning itself as the authoritative source for planning documents in Estonia. Its business model is public service-oriented, offering free access to planning data. The site leverages partnerships with related domains such as planeerimine.ee for user guides and maaruum.ee for contact and support. The platform's technical maturity is moderate, with a modern tech stack but some room for improvement in privacy and security policies. The target audience includes local governments, planners, and citizens, supporting transparency and accessibility in urban planning processes.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and a Content-Security-Policy header restricting base URI to self. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and Angular's reactive forms provide secure input handling. However, the absence of additional security headers like X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy, and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact, represent areas for improvement. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, which is a GDPR compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  3. Enhance security headers by adding X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zone Media OÜ
Description
Riiklik kehtestatud planeeringute andmekogu (PLANK) säilitab ja avalikustab planeeringute andmeid ning võimaldab kiiret ligipääsu planeeringu failidele ja andmetele otse rakenduse või teenuste kaudu.
Key services
Planeeringute otsing, Planeeringu failide allalaadimine, Planeeringulahenduse andmete kuvamine kaardil
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 14, Material Design Components, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • No exposed credentials in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with Angular reactive forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related official data repository for planning documents in Estonia
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Uses modern Angular framework and Material Design for UI
  4. Includes Google Analytics for user tracking without visible consent mechanism
  5. Contact information is present but limited to email and phone without physical address
  6. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS and CSP are implemented
  7. No visible security or vulnerability disclosure policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 14 with Material Design components, ensuring a modern and responsive UI. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site uses a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict base URI, enhancing security. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the website's business entity. Performance is moderate with deferred and module scripts used appropriately. Accessibility is basic but present, with some ARIA attributes and keyboard focus management. SEO optimization is basic, with meta description and viewport tags present but no Open Graph or structured data detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planeeringud.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planeeringud.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.