Skip to main content

Security report for planeerimine.ee

Planeerimine.ee · Government · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Planeerimine.ee is an Estonian government-related informational website dedicated to spatial planning. It provides comprehensive materials including legal documents, guidelines, FAQs, and training information to support planners and stakeholders in Estonia. The site targets professionals and public officials involved in spatial planning and related regulatory processes. The business model is primarily informational and educational, positioning itself as an authoritative resource within the Estonian government sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and accessibility tools. The site is mobile-optimized, uses HTTPS, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. SEO and accessibility features are well integrated, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, some security headers are not explicitly present, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture and technical maturity suitable for a government informational portal. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and incident response policies, and maintaining up-to-date software to mitigate risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planeerimine.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Planeerimine.ee occupies a niche as a government-backed spatial planning resource in Estonia, serving planners, municipalities, and stakeholders. Its competitive advantage lies in authoritative content and official backing. The business model focuses on providing free, accessible information and training resources. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting public funding or governmental support. The target customer segment is specialized professionals and public sector entities. Growth indicators include regular content updates and event announcements. The partnership ecosystem includes related Estonian government domains such as riigiplaneering.ee and planeeringud.ee, indicating collaboration within the public sector. Operationally, the site maintains a consistent brand and content quality, reinforcing its market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Accessibility tools enhance usability for diverse users. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and incident response policies. Incident response readiness is unclear. Overall, the site aligns with basic security best practices but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and documented policies to meet GDPR and NIS2 standards fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Planeerimine.ee
Description
Provides materials and explanations related to spatial planning law and its implementation documents, guidelines, FAQs, training information, and other related content to support better understanding and assistance in spatial planning.
Key services
Provision of spatial planning legal documents and explanations, Guidelines and clarifying materials, FAQs related to spatial planning, Information on training and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), jQuery, Tippy.js, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, Helpie FAQ plugin, Wedocs plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA script
  • Accessibility toolbar implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related informational portal focused on spatial planning in Estonia.
  2. Content is in Estonian with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Accessibility features are implemented including an accessibility toolbar.
  7. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking with opt-out functionality.
  9. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
  10. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1, leveraging plugins such as MonsterInsights for Google Analytics, Helpie FAQ, Wedocs, and Getwid blocks. It uses jQuery and Tippy.js for UI enhancements and FontAwesome for icons. The site is hosted under the domain planeerimine.ee registered with Zone Media OÜ since 2015. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features including an accessibility toolbar. SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a government informational portal.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planeerimine.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planeerimine.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.