Security report for pixl8.co.uk
Pixl8 Group Limited · Technology · United Kingdom
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Pixl8 Group Limited is a well-established technology company specializing in digital solutions for membership organisations, associations, and charities. With over 20 years of experience, Pixl8 offers a comprehensive suite of services including technology consultancy, website development, CRM, systems integration, and digital analytics. The company holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, underscoring its commitment to information security and data protection. Their global presence with offices in the UK, USA, Australia, and Malaysia supports a broad client base of over 200 non-profit organizations worldwide. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Piwik PRO analytics, and a responsive design framework based on Bootstrap. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, ensuring performance and security benefits. Cookie consent management is robust and GDPR compliant, with clear user controls and detailed policies. From a security perspective, Pixl8 maintains a strong posture with HTTPS enforced, ISO 27001 certification, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some security headers are not explicitly confirmed, representing areas for improvement. Incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, Pixl8 presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence aligned with its business focus on technology solutions for the non-profit sector. The website quality, privacy compliance, and security practices are strong, supporting a high level of business credibility and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 100/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching pixl8.co.uk
This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 65
- Security headers
- 50
- Email security
- 85
- DNS health
- 90
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 100
- Average
- 82
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
- Publish explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
- Provide a dedicated security or incident response contact channel (e.g., security@pixl8.com) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
- Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible disclosure.
- Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Contact details published on the site
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Pixl8 Group Limited
- Description
- Pixl8 is a technology company providing market-leading engagement solutions for membership organisations with over 20 years' experience in web design, development and membership software. They offer digital transformation, CRM, systems integration, website optimisation and more.
- Key services
- Technology and digital consultancy, Website development, Data optimisation, UX research & design, Systems integration, Digital analytics
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, jQuery, Bootstrap, Modernizr, CookieControl
- Frameworks
- Bootstrap
- Platforms
- SaaS
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- ISO 27001 certification
- Cookie consent management with granular controls
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts with consent
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, HubSpot Analytics
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Piwik PRO
- Marketing tools
- HubSpot, Piwik PRO
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
- Strong privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms.
- Use of multiple reputable analytics and marketing platforms with consent management.
- ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed indicating strong security posture.
- Multiple office locations worldwide indicating international presence.
- No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
- No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; contact primarily via forms and physical addresses.
- No terms of service page detected.
- Consistent branding and professional design throughout the site.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 79/100 −3Low24 findingsView report
- 82/100Low22 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with pixl8.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixl8.co.uk.