Skip to main content

Security report for pixer.be

PIXER · Other · Belgium

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PIXER is a small Belgian graphic design and laser cutting bureau specializing in custom graphic solutions including signage, laser and cut work, folding machines, and installation services. The company targets local businesses and individuals requiring tailored graphic design and production services. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and incorporates SEO optimization via Yoast SEO plugin. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is well-structured with good content quality and consistent branding, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosures. WHOIS data is restricted, indicating privacy protection, which is typical for small businesses. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pixer.be

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PIXER operates in the niche market of graphic design and laser cutting services in Belgium, focusing on custom and small to medium-sized projects. The business model is service-oriented, relying on bespoke client projects. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Pinterest, enhancing its market reach and customer engagement. The lack of detailed business registration information on the website suggests a small enterprise with limited public disclosures. The use of modern CMS and SEO tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The company appears to be well-positioned locally but could improve transparency and compliance to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the site's readiness for coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PIXER
Description
Graficus Pieter Puype PIXER, buro der grafische oplossingen. GRAFISCH ONTWERP / LASER- & CUTWERK / PLOOIMETERS / INSTALLATIE / SIGNALISATIE
Key services
Graphic design, Laser cutting, Plooimeters (folding machines), Installation, Signage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, jQuery, FastWP Shortcodes plugin, Avada Theme
Frameworks
Avada Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local graphic design and laser cutting service provider
  2. Content is in Dutch (nl-NL) targeting local Belgian audience
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content, but physical address and contact form likely present
  5. Uses WordPress with Avada theme and Yoast SEO plugin
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. WHOIS data is restricted with 'NOT ALLOWED' status, indicating privacy protection
  9. No WAF or blocking detected, site content fully accessible
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich framework. It uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and marketing. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with good responsive design. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and standard for small business websites, but there is room for improvement in security configurations and compliance-related features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pixer.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixer.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.