Skip to main content

Security report for pivovarneratov.cz

Pivovar Neratov · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pivovar Neratov is a small brewery based in the Czech Republic specializing in the production and sale of beer and other alcoholic beverages. The website clearly targets adult consumers and includes an age verification gate to restrict access to users over 18 years old. The business appears to be locally focused with direct contact information and a straightforward business model centered on manufacturing and sales. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and operational timeline of the business. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It leverages common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility and SEO features. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements an age gate for compliance with alcohol sales regulations. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not provide visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present, indicating a potential gap in security transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional for a small brewery business but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and clearer policies to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pivovarneratov.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the alcoholic beverage manufacturing sector with a focus on local market presence in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche brewery production and direct consumer engagement through e-commerce. The business model is straightforward, relying on product sales and brand recognition. Contact details and operational hours are clearly communicated, supporting customer service. The absence of extensive certifications or partnerships suggests a small-scale operation. Growth potential may be tied to expanding online sales and improving digital marketing. The website integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, indicating some level of digital maturity. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced privacy and security policies to align with EU regulations and build consumer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and an age verification mechanism to restrict underage access. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner to comply with EU cookie regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet WCAG standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pivovar Neratov
Description
Pivovar Neratov is a brewery located in Neratov, Czech Republic, producing and selling alcoholic beverages, specifically beer.
Key services
Beer production, Sales of alcoholic beverages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Age verification gate for alcohol content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor.
  2. Age verification gate is implemented for alcohol-related content.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Contact information including phone and email is clearly displayed.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  6. SSL is enabled and functioning.
  7. No advanced security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. External resources include Google Fonts, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Google Tag Manager.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. Content is in Czech language targeting local Czech audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with WooCommerce and Elementor, leveraging popular libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive and has a good design quality. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and optimization. The technical infrastructure is standard for small business e-commerce but lacks advanced security configurations and accessibility enhancements. Hosting appears stable with REG-WEBGLOBE as the registrar. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML content. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and improve SEO and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pivovarneratov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pivovarneratov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.