Skip to main content

Security report for pipol.com

Pipol A/S · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pipol A/S is a Denmark-based company specializing in international ERP implementations, particularly focusing on Microsoft Dynamics 365 solutions. Established in 2000, the company has built a strong market position with local expertise in over 85 countries and a large team of more than 4500 Dynamics 365 consultants. Their business model centers on providing centralized management combined with local delivery and support, targeting international companies seeking efficient and risk-minimized ERP implementations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and a strong emphasis on global reach and local knowledge. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and analytics tools including Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. The site is hosted on servers associated with Dandomain, with good SSL configuration and moderate performance. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a long-established registration without privacy protection, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Pipol's website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good business credibility and privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding security headers, DNSSEC, and incident response disclosures. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, allowing full content analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pipol.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pipol.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pipol.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pipol operates in the technology sector, focusing on international ERP implementation services with a specialization in Microsoft Dynamics 365. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive global footprint, local expertise, and a large pool of specialized consultants. The company targets multinational enterprises requiring centralized yet locally adapted ERP solutions. Revenue streams likely include consulting, implementation, license management, upgrades, cloud migration, and support services. The partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft and various ISV solution partners. Growth indicators include a presence in 85+ countries and over 4500 consultants. The website content and client logos suggest a reputable market position with a focus on quality and risk mitigation in ERP projects.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is supported by cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a service provider but could be enhanced to meet higher industry standards and improve customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pipol A/S
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pipol A/S
Description
Pipol specializes in simplifying international Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementations, offering centralized management with local expertise across 85+ countries.
Key services
International ERP Implementations, ERP Implementation Challenges, International Microsoft License Management, Upgrade Your Dynamics 365 ERP, Move Your Dynamics 365 ERP to the Cloud, International Support Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Leadinfo
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Clear focus on international ERP implementation services
  3. Strong presence and local expertise emphasized
  4. Comprehensive contact options including email, phone, and contact form
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented indicating GDPR awareness
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webflow CMS platform with jQuery 3.4.1 and integrates modern analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is provided via Dandomain with domain registration dating back to 2000, indicating a stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and preloads fonts for performance. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but adding security headers and DNSSEC would strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pipol.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pipol.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.