Skip to main content

Security report for piper.dk

PIPER ApS · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PIPER ApS is a Danish small business specializing in graphic design and signage solutions, offering unique visual branding services. The website presents a professional design with clear branding and is targeted at businesses and individuals seeking creative signage and graphic design. The company has a long-established domain since 1998, indicating a stable market presence in Denmark. Technically, the website is built using the BaseKit CMS platform, leveraging external resources hosted on builder.nu domains and Google Fonts. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimization. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended to enhance protection. Privacy compliance is limited, with no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, although a cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piper.dk

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention piper.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for piper.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PIPER ApS operates in the graphic design and signage sector, focusing on delivering visually distinctive solutions. The business model is service-oriented, catering primarily to local Danish clients. The company leverages its long domain history to establish credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the provided data. Revenue streams likely derive from design services and signage production. The website content is consistent and well-branded, targeting businesses and individuals needing custom visual solutions. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the data. The company could enhance its market position by expanding digital presence and adding trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of explicit incident response contacts or security policies limits preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and terms of service documentation. To improve security maturity, the company should implement recommended headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish clear security and privacy policies. Regular security audits and vulnerability assessments are advised.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PIPER ApS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PIPER ApS
Description
PIPER – Grafisk design- og skiltevirksomhed. Vi skaber visuelle løsninger, der skiller sig ud. Imagine more med unikke designs og skilte!
Key services
Graphic design, Signage solutions, Visual branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
BaseKit, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Playfair Display, Rubik)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small Danish graphic design and signage company
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet
  5. Uses BaseKit CMS and external resources hosted on builder.nu domains
  6. No security headers detected, DNSSEC not enabled
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  8. No social media links or structured data (JSON-LD) found in provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on BaseKit CMS, utilizing external CSS and font resources hosted on builder.nu and Google Fonts. The tech stack includes FontAwesome icons and web fonts Playfair Display and Rubik. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness but basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) detected. Hosting appears to be via builder.nu infrastructure. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or platforms. Technical debt is low but the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates room for modernization. Performance tuning and accessibility improvements could enhance user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piper.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piper.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.