Skip to main content

Security report for pinwheel.eu

CORNUCOPIAS.COM OÜ · Other · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pinwheel.eu is a straightforward domain sales landing page operated by CORNUCOPIAS.COM OÜ, an Estonian company. It offers the domain for sale via the Sedo.com marketplace, highlighting buyer protection and secure escrow services. The site targets domain investors and buyers interested in acquiring the pinwheel.eu domain. The business model is focused on domain brokerage and resale, leveraging Sedo.com's platform for transactions. The website content is minimal and primarily informational, with a contact form for submitting offers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pinwheel.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a domain reseller using an established marketplace partner, Sedo.com, which provides trust signals such as buyer protection and escrow services. The domain is newly registered in 2023, consistent with the sales intent. The target audience is niche, focusing on domain investors and buyers. The business model relies on domain sales commissions or direct sales. The partnership with Sedo.com is critical for transaction facilitation. The company appears small with limited direct contact information, relying on marketplace infrastructure for credibility.

Security posture

The website lacks HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy policies, which are significant security and compliance gaps. The contact form collects personal data but does not display GDPR compliance or cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of Axios and basic JavaScript indicates minimal technical complexity but also limited security controls. Overall, the security posture is weak and could expose users to risks such as data interception or form abuse.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Incorporate CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures on the contact form to prevent spam and abuse.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CORNUCOPIAS.COM OÜ
Description
The website is a domain sales landing page offering the domain pinwheel.eu for sale through Sedo.com, a domain marketplace platform.
Key services
Domain sales, Buyer protection program, Secure escrow transfers, Negotiation facilitation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Inter), Axios (for HTTP requests)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is http:// but no direct evidence of HTTPS)
  • Form input validation with error messages

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple domain sales landing page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present.
  3. Contact form collects personal data but lacks visible privacy compliance.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. External links primarily to domain marketplace Sedo.com and font providers.
  6. No social media or direct company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  7. Website uses modern fonts and basic JavaScript libraries (Axios).
  8. No CMS or complex backend technologies detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Axios usage.
  10. Domain is newly registered and listed for sale by a known Estonian company.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple tech stack with HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Axios for HTTP requests. There is no detected CMS or complex backend framework. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta description or Open Graph tags. The site relies on external domains for fonts and payment checkout. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking beyond form submission scripts. The technical implementation is basic and suitable for a landing page but lacks modern security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pinwheel.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pinwheel.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.