Skip to main content

Security report for pinkgirls.top

Other · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pinkgirls.top operates as an adult content forum specializing in teen pornography, offering a platform for sharing videos and pictures within a niche community. The site leverages MyBB forum software and jQuery libraries, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC or security headers. The business model appears to rely on forum membership and advertising revenue, with multiple external adult sites linked as partners or affiliates. However, the site does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it offer contact information, which raises concerns about transparency and compliance. The domain is privacy protected and registered since 2021, which aligns with the site's apparent age but obscures registrant details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pinkgirls.top

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adults interested in teen pornography content, positioning itself as a niche forum with a large registered user base but minimal active posting. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized content and community focus. Revenue streams likely include advertising via JuicyAds and affiliate links to other adult sites. The partnership ecosystem includes several related adult domains, suggesting a networked approach to traffic and monetization. Growth indicators are limited due to low posting activity, and the lack of compliance documentation may hinder broader market acceptance.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies. While HTTPS is enabled, the SSL configuration quality is basic. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies indicates low maturity in security governance. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS data, while common in adult sites, reduces transparency and trust. The site is vulnerable to potential risks due to missing security best practices and lack of compliance with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response channel for security issues.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities in the forum software and server configuration.
  5. Develop an age verification mechanism and content warnings to comply with legal requirements for adult content.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ultimate forum for true teen girls lovers. Huge collection of cute teens videos and pictures.
Key services
forum discussions, sharing teen porn videos and pictures, advertising adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
MyBB forum software, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content forum focused on teen pornography
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  4. Uses MyBB forum software with jQuery
  5. Multiple external adult and suspicious domains linked
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures
  7. Domain registered in 2021 with privacy protection
  8. Content is explicit and targeted at adults only
  9. Advertising via JuicyAds network present
  10. No GDPR or data protection compliance indicators
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses MyBB forum software with jQuery libraries, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but without DNSSEC enabled. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no advanced caching or optimization detected. The site lacks mobile optimization beyond basic responsiveness. Technical debt is evident in missing security headers and lack of modern compliance features. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pinkgirls.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pinkgirls.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.