Skip to main content

Security report for pineparks.ee

Pineparks Technologies · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pineparks Technologies is a small Estonian-based technology company specializing in professional web development, e-commerce solutions, software development, mobile app creation, and UX design. The company has a strong market position supported by international awards and a multi-entity presence including domains in Estonia, the UK, and Switzerland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pineparks.ee

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pineparks.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pineparks.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses seeking tailored digital solutions, offering a range of services from custom software to mobile applications and design. Their business model is service-oriented with a focus on efficiency and automation to reduce client costs. Pineparks maintains a competitive advantage through award recognition and a consistent brand presence across multiple countries. Their partnership ecosystem includes related domains in London and Switzerland, indicating international operations. Growth indicators include participation in major technology conferences and a portfolio of notable clients. The company emphasizes quality and innovation, positioning itself as a reliable technology partner in the Baltic region and beyond.

Security posture

Pineparks exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile for form protection, and a detailed cookie consent system compliant with GDPR. Security headers are partially detected or implied, but explicit publication of security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs is absent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the website content. The security score is high but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and expanding HTTP security headers. The company shows awareness of privacy and security best practices but lacks transparency in some areas.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers explicitly, including Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pineparks OÜ
Registration number
EE101831592
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pineparks Technologies
Description
Professionaalne e-poe loomine ja veebiarendus – kaasaegsed lahendused sinu ettevõttele. Alusta oma veebiprojektiga juba täna!
Key services
Tarkvaraarendus, Veebiarendus, WordPressi arendus, Mobiilirakenduste arendus, Disain
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Laravel, WordPress, Vue.js, React.js, Flutter, Node.js, Gravity Forms
Frameworks
Laravel, Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile for forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce and integrity attributes in scripts (implied)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  3. Multiple language support with hreflang tags
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. Active social media presence linked
  6. Contact form uses CAPTCHA for spam protection
  7. Clear business identity with structured data markup
  8. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly linked
  9. No terms of service page detected
  10. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern technology stack including PHP, Laravel, Vue.js, React.js, Flutter, and Node.js. It uses Gravity Forms for contact forms with CAPTCHA integration for spam prevention. Performance optimizations include lazy loading, script deferring, and preloading of assets. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices such as meta tags, hreflang, and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicit but the presence of Cloudflare challenge scripts suggests CDN usage. The technical implementation is robust with minimal technical debt visible, supporting a fast and reliable user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pineparks.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pineparks.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.