Skip to main content

Security report for pigugroup.eu

PHH Group · Other · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PHH Group operates a multilingual website presenting itself as a marketplace platform and corporate group entity, likely focused on hobby or retail sectors in Lithuania or the Baltic region. The website content is minimal, with basic promotional information and no detailed business descriptions or contact data. Technically, the site uses AngularJS 1.8.2, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure transport, but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation. No forms or direct user data collection points are present on the homepage. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity but lacks transparency in privacy and contact information, which may impact user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pigugroup.eu

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
81

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small-scale marketplace operator with a regional focus in Lithuania or nearby countries, supported by multilingual content in English, Latvian, and Polish. The business model centers on providing a platform for sellers and buyers, but no detailed information on revenue streams or partnerships is available. The lack of contact details and certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The use of a known Lithuanian registrar aligns with the regional focus. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks a published privacy policy, terms of service, and security policy documents. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the security posture. The use of AngularJS 1.x, an older framework, may pose potential security risks if not properly maintained. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  5. Upgrade or audit AngularJS usage to mitigate potential security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PHH Group
Description
PHH Group appears to be a business entity offering a marketplace platform and company information. The website references 'Pigu Hobby Hall Group' in the footer with a 2025 copyright, suggesting a hobby or retail related business group. The site provides multilingual support (English, Latvian, Polish) and promotes a marketplace for selling.
Key services
Marketplace platform, Corporate group information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
AngularJS 1.8.2, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security warnings.
  2. Cookie consent banner and detailed cookie information present, but no privacy policy page found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data.
  5. Site uses AngularJS 1.x, which is an older framework version.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No social media links or business certifications displayed.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly promotional with limited business detail.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on EasyWeb4 CMS and uses AngularJS 1.8.2 for frontend interactivity. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and tracking, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads asynchronously tracking scripts and uses canonical and Open Graph meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The lack of advanced SEO and accessibility enhancements suggests room for technical modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. No forms or complex user input mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pigugroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pigugroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.