Skip to main content

Security report for pigu.lt

E-commerce · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pigu.lt is an established Lithuanian e-commerce platform, operating since 2008, offering a broad range of consumer products across multiple categories. The domain registration data is consistent with the business's regional focus and indicates a legitimate and mature online retail presence. However, the current accessible content is blocked by Cloudflare's Turnstile captcha, preventing full content analysis. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare for DNS and security, indicating a focus on protection against automated threats. Despite this, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible in the accessible content, and no contact information or certifications are found, limiting assessment of compliance and trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pigu.lt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pigu.lt targets general consumers in Lithuania with a wide product offering, positioning itself as a large online retail marketplace. The business model is based on e-commerce sales across diverse categories such as electronics, home goods, cosmetics, and more. The domain age and registrar data support a stable market presence. However, lack of visible business contact details and policies in the accessible content restricts deeper insights into customer support and regulatory compliance. The use of Cloudflare services suggests an emphasis on security and uptime.

Security posture

The site employs Cloudflare's security services including Turnstile captcha, which provides robust protection against bots and automated attacks. SSL is enabled with good configuration. However, the absence of visible security headers and policies in the accessible content limits the evaluation of comprehensive security practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the accessible content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not visible, indicating potential gaps in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Make privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible and compliant with GDPR.
  2. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts.
  3. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance trust.
  5. Improve transparency on data protection and user consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The HTML content is a Cloudflare Turnstile captcha challenge page indicating bot protection and access restriction. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website appears to be an e-commerce platform targeting Lithuanian customers, offering a wide range of product categories as indicated by CSS comments (e.g., furniture, electronics, cosmetics, sports, pets, etc.).
Key services
Online product sales across multiple categories

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, HTML5, CSS3

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare WAF and Turnstile captcha for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Key observations

  1. Website content is currently blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile captcha.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies in the provided HTML.
  3. No contact information or business certifications found in the accessible content.
  4. WHOIS data indicates a well-established domain with consistent registration details.
  5. Technical infrastructure uses Cloudflare for DNS and security.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the blocked content.
  7. Content safety is rated safe with no adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for DNS and security, including Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML and CSS are modern but content is blocked by the WAF challenge, preventing full technical assessment. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable in the accessible content. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The domain is well maintained with a long registration period. Technical risks are minimal from the visible data, but lack of visible policies and contact info may impact user trust and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pigu.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pigu.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.