Skip to main content

Security report for pigtailsextube.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PigtailSexTube.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of amateur and hardcore pornographic videos. The site offers a wide range of categorized content targeting an adult audience, with a business model primarily based on advertising and content aggregation. The website has been operational since 2013, indicating a stable presence in the niche adult content market. However, it lacks formal privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and vanilla-lazyload for image optimization. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. However, it lacks advanced security headers and uses an unsafe referrer policy, which could expose user data. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a consistent registration history, but no detailed business entity information is provided. From a security perspective, the site shows minimal security best practices and no incident response or data protection officer information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, combined with unsafe referrer settings, poses compliance risks, especially under GDPR. The site also lacks visible analytics or advertising network integrations, which may indicate limited tracking or a minimal marketing approach. Overall, while the site serves its niche effectively, it has significant gaps in privacy, security, and compliance that could impact user trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic improvements in these areas are recommended to enhance the site's credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pigtailsextube.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, focusing on free pornographic video streaming with a broad category offering. Its market positioning is niche, targeting adults seeking amateur and hardcore content. The business model appears to rely on advertising revenue and partnerships with similar adult content sites, as evidenced by numerous friendly partner links. The site has maintained a consistent domain registration since 2013, suggesting operational stability. However, the lack of formal business disclosures, privacy policies, and contact details limits transparency. The partnership ecosystem is extensive within the adult content niche, indicating a strategy of cross-promotion and traffic sharing. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the volume of categories and search terms suggests active content curation. The site does not appear to engage in direct sales or subscription services.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic and lacks several critical protections. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security increases the risk of common web attacks. The referrer policy is set to unsafe-url, potentially leaking sensitive user navigation data. No HTTPS configuration details were provided, but the domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which helps prevent unauthorized domain transfers. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site does not provide contact channels for security issues, nor does it have a data protection officer listed. These gaps expose the site to compliance risks and potential exploitation. Implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and establishing clear security policies would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Review and secure JavaScript redirection and history manipulation to prevent potential abuse.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear security contact channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
PigtailSexTube.Com - High Quality Amateur Porn Tube, First Time Hardcore Fucking HD Videos and other hot sex action!
Key services
free porn video streaming, video categorization, search functionality
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, vanilla-lazyload, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform with extensive pornographic video categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance.
  3. Contact available only via a contact page, no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. Website uses common JavaScript libraries and lazy loading for images.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked, all related to adult content.
  7. No analytics or advertising network scripts detected in the HTML.
  8. Referrer policy is set to unsafe-url, which may expose user data.
  9. No GDPR or data protection officer information present.
  10. Content is clearly adult and NSFW, targeting adults only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack with jQuery and vanilla-lazyload for lazy loading images, which helps performance. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for viewport and description, but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO. The site uses POST method in the search form with dynamic URL construction for search queries. The referrer policy is set to unsafe-url, which is not recommended. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit beyond the registrar information. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is basic, missing advanced metadata and structured data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pigtailsextube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pigtailsextube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.