Skip to main content

Security report for pienaslt.lt

Pienas LT · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pienas LT is a Lithuanian cooperative specializing in uniting dairy farms and producing high-quality dairy protein products for export to over 40 countries. The cooperative is positioned as the largest of its kind in the Baltic region, emphasizing sustainability, quality certifications, and technological advancement. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the business content and certifications support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and well-structured, targeting dairy producers and international food industry partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pienaslt.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pienaslt.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pienaslt.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The cooperative business model focuses on aggregating dairy producers to enhance market power and product quality. Pienas LT leverages export markets extensively, with a strong brand presence through BaltMilk. The company emphasizes sustainability and innovation, investing in advanced processing technologies and green initiatives. The website content highlights certifications and export reach, indicating a growth-oriented and quality-driven operation. The lack of direct contact details on the site may limit immediate customer engagement but aligns with a B2B cooperative structure. The partnership with BaltMilk and focus on international markets suggest strategic positioning in the global dairy ingredient supply chain.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not evident in the provided data, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is good but could be improved by adding security headers, explicit policies, and incident response contacts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate informational site but lacks some best practices for comprehensive protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page linked in the footer.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Add terms of service and cookie policy pages for transparency and compliance.
  4. Provide explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response policy and contact channel for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pienas LT
Description
Esame pažangių pieno ūkių kooperatyvas, vienijantis 271 Lietuvos pieno gamintoją ir 239 darbuotojus. Mūsų nariai gamina aukščiausios kokybės pieną, kurį perdirbame į pasaulinio lygio pieno baltymų produktus eksportuojamus į daugiau kaip 40 šalių.
Key services
Pieno ūkių kooperacija, Pieno perdirbimas į pieno baltymų produktus, Eksportas į daugiau kaip 40 šalių, Tvaraus verslo vystymas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), htmx.org, AOS (Animate On Scroll), GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), jQuery, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS
  7. Certifications and export markets are prominently displayed
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including htmx, GSAP, AOS, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup for animations and UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance appears moderate with video backgrounds and multiple scripts, which may impact load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pienaslt.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pienaslt.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.